Luke 37064 Posted March 21, 2021 Author Share Posted March 21, 2021 On 3/19/2021 at 7:50 AM, Jeryd said: Hi all. I'm running emby on an unRaid docker with NVIDIA pass through. I also have a 10 series i5 powering the server. Is it possible to pass through 2x gpus (NVIDIA + Intel) to emby? (would emby put them to use?) Hi, yes it is possible, although we don't currently load balance between mulitple GPU's, so you'd have to pick which one you want Emby to use. GPU load balancing is something we're interested in exploring in future updates though. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeryd 1 Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 11 hours ago, Luke said: Hi, yes it is possible, although we don't currently load balance between mulitple GPU's, so you'd have to pick which one you want Emby to use. GPU load balancing is something we're interested in exploring in future updates though. Thanks. Luke, thanks for the response. Good to know about the load balancing. Ill stick with the Nvidia for now, and test out load balancing if it shows up in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kodi_Newcomer 27 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 (edited) Hello i need some help. This a part of my stack file. docker-embyserver: container_name: docker-embyserver image: emby/embyserver runtime: nvidia network_mode: 'service:docker-ovpnclient' depends_on: - docker-ovpnclient environment: - PUID=1000 - PGID=100 - GIDLIST=100,44 volumes: - /home/homeserver/Embyserver/config:/config - /mnt/Storage1:/mnt/Storage1 - /mnt/Storage2:/mnt/Storage2 - /mnt/Storage3:/mnt/Storage3 devices: /dev/dri/renderD128:/dev/dri/renderD128 restart: unless-stopped Ports are at a higher place. But when i will update the stack, it becomes an error. Quote compose.yml' is invalid because: services.docker-embyserver.devices contains an invalid type, it should be an array What i'm doing wrong ? Edited April 11, 2021 by Kodi_Newcomer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastrmind11 717 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 3 hours ago, Kodi_Newcomer said: Hello i need some help. This a part of my stack file. docker-embyserver: container_name: docker-embyserver image: emby/embyserver runtime: nvidia network_mode: 'service:docker-ovpnclient' depends_on: - docker-ovpnclient environment: - PUID=1000 - PGID=100 - GIDLIST=100,44 volumes: - /home/homeserver/Embyserver/config:/config - /mnt/Storage1:/mnt/Storage1 - /mnt/Storage2:/mnt/Storage2 - /mnt/Storage3:/mnt/Storage3 devices: /dev/dri/renderD128:/dev/dri/renderD128 restart: unless-stopped Ports are at a higher place. But when i will update the stack, it becomes an error. What i'm doing wrong ? your devices block is wrong. remove the renderD128, it's implied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kodi_Newcomer 27 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 39 minutes ago, mastrmind11 said: your devices block is wrong. remove the renderD128, it's implied. Hm, i have tried it with and without this. Always the same error. This is the start of my stack file :: version: '3.4' services: docker-ovpnclient: container_name: docker-ovpnclient image: dperson/openvpn-client cap_add: - net_admin networks: - vpn environment: PUID: 1000 PGID: 1000 ports: - 8080:8080 - 9090:9090 - 8081:8081 - 7878:7878 - 8096:8096 - 8920:8920 dns: xxxx xxxx xxxx restart: unless-stopped docker-embyserver: container_name: docker-embyserver image: emby/embyserver runtime: nvidia network_mode: 'service:docker-ovpnclient' depends_on: - docker-ovpnclient environment: - PUID=1000 - PGID=100 - GIDLIST=100,44 volumes: - /home/homeserver/Embyserver/config:/config - /mnt/Storage1:/mnt/Storage1 - /mnt/Storage2:/mnt/Storage2 - /mnt/Storage3:/mnt/Storage3 devices: /dev/dri:/dev/dri restart: unless-stopped networks: vpn: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucryd 216 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 (edited) @Kodi_Newcomer The error speaks for itself, devices is an array, you're missing a dash https://www.w3schools.io/file/yaml-arrays/. Edited April 11, 2021 by alucryd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kodi_Newcomer 27 Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 oh my good, yes no i see it. Ok, i will try it again. Thanks men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delloriane 0 Posted April 21, 2021 Share Posted April 21, 2021 (edited) Hi, I am running Emby on UnRaid. I have it installed but I have a problem at the time of including HDHomerun source. I am using Xteve, witch is running also in unraid but it is running in a different network (br0) than Emby (this is because the only way that I found to detect mi sat>ip by tvheadend was setting it in br0 [nor bridge nor emby network detect it]). I do no t have to much knowledge on docker but I think what I need is open Emby Homerun reading to host. So the question is, which port uses Emby to charge the homerun? Xteve runs in 192.168.68.20:34400. Thank you for your support Edit: Solved with command "docker network connect cdocknet xteve" for xteve, tvheadend and oscam. Running all in the same network. Edited April 21, 2021 by delloriane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnollo 16 Posted April 22, 2021 Share Posted April 22, 2021 I use UnRaid too, and the Emby Docker. A few unraid servers have been hacked and wiped of all data, I don't expose the unraid server interface, just the emby module, using Cloudflare as per guide below https://blog.awelswynol.co.uk/2018-01-setting-up-cloudflare-with-emby/ I changed my emby password, and I am the only administrator. If someone was able to hack into my login anway, they coudl delete the files from the interface. I was wondering if there is a way to block data deletion at the docker level, so even an admin profile who connects to emby externally cannot delete any files? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37064 Posted April 24, 2021 Author Share Posted April 24, 2021 On 4/22/2021 at 11:15 AM, gnollo said: I use UnRaid too, and the Emby Docker. A few unraid servers have been hacked and wiped of all data, I don't expose the unraid server interface, just the emby module, using Cloudflare as per guide below https://blog.awelswynol.co.uk/2018-01-setting-up-cloudflare-with-emby/ I changed my emby password, and I am the only administrator. If someone was able to hack into my login anway, they coudl delete the files from the interface. I was wondering if there is a way to block data deletion at the docker level, so even an admin profile who connects to emby externally cannot delete any files? Hi, yes I would just setup your mounts as readonly: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19158810/docker-mount-volumes-as-readonly/20317879 Or at least the ones that are for your media folders. Keep in mind, if you enable any features that save metadata to media folders, this will cause those features to not work as expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnollo 16 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 On 4/24/2021 at 1:52 AM, Luke said: Hi, yes I would just setup your mounts as readonly: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19158810/docker-mount-volumes-as-readonly/20317879 Or at least the ones that are for your media folders. Keep in mind, if you enable any features that save metadata to media folders, this will cause those features to not work as expected. Thanks Luke, I use MCM to download metadata so I might be OK as most is already saved in the drive. Will see if I can understand how to get that working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37064 Posted May 7, 2021 Author Share Posted May 7, 2021 Let us know how you get on. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alefielm 7 Posted May 8, 2021 Share Posted May 8, 2021 Hi! Can you please check on latest tag for embyserver_arm32v7, it's a 5 month old version, latest on other docker images tagged as latest are version 4.6, for arm still on 4.5 Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucryd 216 Posted May 8, 2021 Share Posted May 8, 2021 No they aren't, all latest tags point to the same version, 4.5.4.0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alefielm 7 Posted May 8, 2021 Share Posted May 8, 2021 (edited) 10 minutes ago, alucryd said: No they aren't, all latest tags point to the same version, 4.5.4.0. Thanks, my bad, I thought 4.6 was released out of beta. Thanks! Edited May 8, 2021 by Alefielm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37064 Posted May 8, 2021 Author Share Posted May 8, 2021 23 minutes ago, Alefielm said: Thanks, my bad, I thought 4.6 was released out of beta. Thanks! It should be this week. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
embilly 0 Posted May 15, 2021 Share Posted May 15, 2021 On 08/05/2021 at 16:41, Luke said: It should be this week. any ideas when the docker stable update would be out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rylando 0 Posted May 24, 2021 Share Posted May 24, 2021 Are there any plans to add a healthcheck command to this image? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37064 Posted May 24, 2021 Author Share Posted May 24, 2021 3 hours ago, rylando said: Are there any plans to add a healthcheck command to this image? Hi, yea it's not a bad idea. Thanks for the feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebasmiles 8 Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 So what is "latest" on right now in terms of version? I am stuck on version 4.5.4.0, I am not getting an update warning on the docker but inside emby it says a new version 4.6.1.0 is available. Just trying to figure out if its just delayed in updating or if I am having issues on my side with Unraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucryd 216 Posted May 30, 2021 Share Posted May 30, 2021 11 hours ago, sebasmiles said: So what is "latest" on right now in terms of version? I am stuck on version 4.5.4.0, I am not getting an update warning on the docker but inside emby it says a new version 4.6.1.0 is available. Just trying to figure out if its just delayed in updating or if I am having issues on my side with Unraid. You can find the tags here: https://hub.docker.com/r/emby/embyserver/tags?page=1&ordering=last_updated Latest is up to date with the latest release (4.6.1.0) as indicated inside emby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ertagon2 44 Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 On 5/24/2021 at 8:43 PM, Luke said: Hi, yea it's not a bad idea. Thanks for the feedback. I would be happy if we got curl or something like that then I can just do healthcheck: test: ["CMD-SHELL", "curl --silent --output /dev/null --show-error --fail https://website.com && exit 0 || exit 1"] interval: 60s timeout: 30s retries: 5 start_period: 60s in the docker-compose file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cypher0117 4 Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 (edited) What changed between 4.6.3.0 and 4.6.4.0? I had to roll back my version to 4.6.3.0 in order for my emby server to recognize my remote sessions as remote. I know it's the emby server since that's the only thing that changed. What I saw on 4.6.4.0: - Route to my emby server address - See the local login page with all local accounts and manual login option - Local accounts work as expected What I saw on 4.6.3.0 - Route to my emby server address - Do not see any local accounts and have the normal remote accounts - Cannot login to my local accounts as expected Edited July 19, 2021 by cypher0117 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy2Play 8281 Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 10 minutes ago, cypher0117 said: What changed between 4.6.3.0 and 4.6.4.0? Primarily this Resolve cause of sporadic database locked errors Fix graphic subs burn-in with tone mapping on qsv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cypher0117 4 Posted July 19, 2021 Share Posted July 19, 2021 Just now, Happy2Play said: Primarily this Resolve cause of sporadic database locked errors Fix graphic subs burn-in with tone mapping on qsv I wouldn't expect that to cause what I'm seeing, but I can definitely repeat it by going back to 4.6.4.0. Any connections that are remote are not seen as remote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now