Jump to content


Photo

Can't remote connect

remote access port forwarding

  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Niazniaz OFFLINE  

Niazniaz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • Local time: 12:20 AM

Posted 24 January 2018 - 02:39 PM

Hey

I can't seem to remote connect to my Emby server.

I went through the connectivity guide, and set up port forwarding but still hasn't helped.

I want to double check if the port forwarding I've done is correct.

My router is the Tenda 11N.

Here are the settings:

Attached File  Tenda Port forwarding.jpg   80.41KB   6 downloads

 

When I tried the http://www.canyouseeme.org/ test I got this result:

 

Error: I could not see your service on 103.85.207.48 on port (8096)
Reason: No route to host

 

FYI I'm pretty much a noob when it comes to network setups so please explain your statements.

Thank you.



#2 Luke OFFLINE  

Luke

    System Architect

  • Administrators
  • 138303 posts
  • Local time: 02:50 PM

Posted 24 January 2018 - 03:22 PM

hi, are you able to connect with other devices while inside your home network?



#3 Niazniaz OFFLINE  

Niazniaz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • Local time: 12:20 AM

Posted 26 January 2018 - 11:44 AM

Yes, I can connect when they're all on the same network, but can't remote connect



#4 Luke OFFLINE  

Luke

    System Architect

  • Administrators
  • 138303 posts
  • Local time: 02:50 PM

Posted 26 January 2018 - 03:42 PM

Well in your screenshot it looks like you're forwarding traffic on port 8096 to two different ip addresses? that's not going to work. Just use the ip address of the machine running emby server.

 

Please let us know if this helps. Thanks.



#5 Niazniaz OFFLINE  

Niazniaz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • Local time: 12:20 AM

Posted 27 January 2018 - 10:55 PM

The ip address of the machine running the is the one that ends with 103.

I let that be the only rule there and tried again, but same result, 

Reason: No route to host

Any other ideas?



#6 Luke OFFLINE  

Luke

    System Architect

  • Administrators
  • 138303 posts
  • Local time: 02:50 PM

Posted 28 January 2018 - 03:56 AM

@Abobader or @pir8radio have you worked with this kind of router before?



#7 pir8radio OFFLINE  

pir8radio

    NGINX

  • Members
  • 2922 posts
  • Local time: 01:50 PM
  • LocationChicago

Posted 28 January 2018 - 05:03 PM

@Abobader or @pir8radio have you worked with this kind of router before?

 

No,  but like you said the .1 line should not be there... 

 

Who is your ISP?  EDIT: never mind it looks like you are in India, is it possible your ISP is blocking inbound connections?  Some Cellular and other ISP's put their customers behind a NAT which doesn't allow inbound connections unless you request them with the ISP.


Edited by pir8radio, 28 January 2018 - 05:17 PM.

  • Abobader likes this

#8 Luke OFFLINE  

Luke

    System Architect

  • Administrators
  • 138303 posts
  • Local time: 02:50 PM

Posted 28 January 2018 - 05:22 PM

Great info, thanks !



#9 Niazniaz OFFLINE  

Niazniaz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • Local time: 12:20 AM

Posted 30 January 2018 - 02:50 AM

Alright thanks,

I'll contact my isp and see what I can do.

But how did you know that I was in India?



#10 pir8radio OFFLINE  

pir8radio

    NGINX

  • Members
  • 2922 posts
  • Local time: 01:50 PM
  • LocationChicago

Posted 30 January 2018 - 08:07 PM

Alright thanks,

I'll contact my isp and see what I can do.

But how did you know that I was in India?

 

Your IP address in your first post.   https://www.infobyip....85.207.48.html


  • Abobader likes this

#11 Niazniaz OFFLINE  

Niazniaz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • Local time: 12:20 AM

Posted 01 February 2018 - 02:34 AM

I tried contacting them, but they weren't giving any concrete answers.

They said that I would need a static ip and that would cost more, so I looked alternatives to it, and came across no-ip.com.

I'll setup a DDNS or whatever and try again.

 

EDIT: Talked them again, they said that  it was working on the static ip? And that they would contact my operator and call back.

EDIT 2: I talked to them and they said that I need a static ip address for it to work. Do you guys know any alternatives? Thanks.


Edited by Niazniaz, 01 February 2018 - 05:26 AM.


#12 pir8radio OFFLINE  

pir8radio

    NGINX

  • Members
  • 2922 posts
  • Local time: 01:50 PM
  • LocationChicago

Posted 02 February 2018 - 08:39 AM

I tried contacting them, but they weren't giving any concrete answers.

They said that I would need a static ip and that would cost more, so I looked alternatives to it, and came across no-ip.com.

I'll setup a DDNS or whatever and try again.

 

EDIT: Talked them again, they said that  it was working on the static ip? And that they would contact my operator and call back.

EDIT 2: I talked to them and they said that I need a static ip address for it to work. Do you guys know any alternatives? Thanks.

 

I still think you may be behind a NAT, they want to give you a real internet IP of your own.  Just using a dynamic DNS service wont help you.  I don't know what your ISP options are out there...  If they are using NAT im guessing you don't have many to pick from?  



#13 Fratopolis OFFLINE  

Fratopolis

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 245 posts
  • Local time: 01:50 PM

Posted 02 February 2018 - 09:34 PM

Never seen a tracert do this before. It just kept going back and forth between it self at the end.

 

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  router.asus.com [10.0.0.1]
  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  3     9 ms     9 ms     8 ms  dtr02socomo-tge-0-7-1-3.soco.mo.charter.com [96.34.54.185]
  4     9 ms     8 ms     9 ms  crr01blvlil-bue-10.blvl.il.charter.com [96.34.76.197]
  5    13 ms    13 ms    15 ms  bbr01blvlil-bue-80.blvl.il.charter.com [96.34.2.168]
  6    34 ms    15 ms    14 ms  bbr01olvemo-bue-3.olve.mo.charter.com [96.34.0.14]
  7    21 ms    22 ms    15 ms  bbr02chcgil-bue-2.chcg.il.charter.com [96.34.0.12]
  8    14 ms    15 ms    15 ms  prr01chcgil-bue-4.chcg.il.charter.com [96.34.3.11]
  9    16 ms    15 ms    16 ms  209-8-108-113.static.pccwglobal.net [209.8.108.113]
 10   208 ms   208 ms   208 ms  TenGE0-4-0-10.br02.hkg15.pccwbtn.net [63.223.15.138]
 11   245 ms   245 ms   245 ms  bharti.te0-5-0-17.br02.hkg15.pccwbtn.net [63.217.17.154]
 12   276 ms   276 ms   276 ms  182.79.175.49
 13   279 ms   277 ms   277 ms  dsl-ncr-dynamic-206.105.16.125.airtelbroadband.in [125.16.105.206]
 14   277 ms   278 ms   277 ms  madurai-eg-175.232.249.45.powergrid.in [45.249.232.175]
 15   286 ms   282 ms   282 ms  103.7.131.181
 16   291 ms   289 ms   290 ms  103.7.131.182
 17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 18   290 ms   289 ms   289 ms  103.85.204.118
 19   298 ms   291 ms   292 ms  103.85.204.117
 20   299 ms   288 ms   289 ms  103.85.204.118
 21   291 ms   290 ms   372 ms  103.85.204.117
 22   290 ms   298 ms   289 ms  103.85.204.118
 23   295 ms   292 ms   296 ms  103.85.204.117
 24   290 ms   288 ms   289 ms  103.85.204.118
 25   312 ms   290 ms   295 ms  103.85.204.117
 26   297 ms   289 ms   289 ms  103.85.204.118
 27   301 ms   296 ms   292 ms  103.85.204.117
 28   290 ms   289 ms   290 ms  103.85.204.118
 29   291 ms   294 ms   291 ms  103.85.204.117
 30   289 ms   289 ms   289 ms  103.85.204.118


#14 Niazniaz OFFLINE  

Niazniaz

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 6 posts
  • Local time: 12:20 AM

Posted 03 February 2018 - 03:30 AM

I still think you may be behind a NAT, they want to give you a real internet IP of your own.  Just using a dynamic DNS service wont help you.  I don't know what your ISP options are out there...  If they are using NAT im guessing you don't have many to pick from?  

Yes, they're the best isp where I live.

I guess I'll have to sign up for a static ip, but first,can somebody explain what Fratopolis's post was about?



#15 vaise OFFLINE  

vaise

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 1059 posts
  • Local time: 04:50 AM

Posted 03 February 2018 - 07:28 PM

I think this sort of thing may happen more and more with ISP's going to CGNAT'ing :

 

https://en.wikipedia...rrier-grade_NAT







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: remote access, port forwarding

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users