SShzin 35 Posted May 1 Posted May 1 32 minutes ago, Cr8iveLosr said: Here’s a simple thought: instead of bombarding him with unnecessary responses, just answer the question. As of right now, there is nothing in the changelogs indicating that this long-standing feature request has been added. The more you know.... My best guess is there's not a real response to the question. Latest has been the same release number for a while now.
Cr8iveLosr 101 Posted May 1 Posted May 1 3 hours ago, SShzin said: My best guess is there's not a real response to the question. Latest has been the same release number for a while now. Yeah, deflect and delay seems to be the default approach about 90% of the time.
ebr 16411 Posted May 1 Posted May 1 We are working completely blind. We cannot see or touch your installation. So, the most specific information we can have is always helpful. You can make it easier for us to help you or more difficult.
Cr8iveLosr 101 Posted May 1 Posted May 1 This isn’t an installation troubleshooting issue, and asking for a version number doesn’t answer the question. The question is simple: Has WebSocket keepalive been lowered to a real world websocket timeout or made configurable in a released server version? If yes, which version and where is the setting? If no, is it still planned? There are already multiple pages explaining the issue. Deflecting back to “what version are you on?” just avoids answering whether the feature exists. 1
SShzin 35 Posted Thursday at 11:53 AM Posted Thursday at 11:53 AM It'll be a week tomorrow so I'll rephrase, using the above question; Has WebSocket keepalive been lowered to a real world websocket timeout or made configurable in a released server version? If yes, which version and where is the setting? If no, is it still planned? 1
Cr8iveLosr 101 Posted Sunday at 06:47 AM Posted Sunday at 06:47 AM It honestly feels like squirrels are being thrown out as distractions at this point. Months ago this was described as an existing keepalive that just needs its interval adjusted, possibly even exposed as a setting. That was framed as a relatively easy change. Yet releases keep coming and this never gets addressed. At this point this isn’t even a feature request anymore. It’s a glitch in the matrix that’s already been identified and can be resolved. A proper keepalive interval of 30–45 seconds, or the previously confirmed configurable option, would directly address the problem being discussed here.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now