ebirman77 1 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 Hello. I am a new user and this is my first post in the forum. I've read https://emby.media/community/index.php?/topic/674-media-files-folders-structure/ , nevertheless I'd like to keep my movies directory structure as it always was: /movies/<director>/<year>-<name>-<other info>. Is there any way to pass this structure as an option or hint to the database scraper with variable substitutions like %D %y %n, etc? If this was asked before please reply with a link to the post. Thank you
Deathsquirrel 743 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 (edited) You might possibly have luck if you add the \director folder to your library instead of \movies. I doubt it but no harm in trying I suppose. Edited October 4, 2017 by Deathsquirrel
Happy2Play 9140 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 I don't think Emby will be able to recognized that naming scheme though. 2
ebr 15435 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 Have you tried adding your current structure as "Mixed Content"? If so, what happened? 1
ebirman77 1 Posted October 4, 2017 Author Posted October 4, 2017 You might possibly have luck if you add the \director folder to your library instead of \movies. I doubt it but no harm in trying I suppose. I enclosed the word “director” inside “<” and “>” signs hoping to imply it is not a literal string but a variable substitution, I am sorry if I wasn't clear.
Luke 38825 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 Can you show us a screenshot of an example? This is hard to visualize. Thanks. 1
dcook 280 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 I can't think of any logical reason why you would want to store your movies by Director on the file system. 1
Untoten 303 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 I can't think of any logical reason why you would want to store your movies by Director on the file system. Seriously, that seems like a nightmare.
ebirman77 1 Posted October 4, 2017 Author Posted October 4, 2017 Can you show us a screenshot of an example? This is hard to visualize. Thanks. Please ignore any inconsistencies, missing colons, and such. This is just to give you the picture
ebirman77 1 Posted October 4, 2017 Author Posted October 4, 2017 I can't think of any logical reason why you would want to store your movies by Director on the file system. Sometimes I think this myself Any order seems arbitrary and I won't discuss the reason of my preference here. I am not asking this just for myself but for any other person who might dislike a directory structure being enforced. It just seems a sensible feature to request for.
ebirman77 1 Posted October 4, 2017 Author Posted October 4, 2017 Have you tried adding your current structure as "Mixed Content"? If so, what happened? What would I accomplish?
Happy2Play 9140 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 Structure can be worked with but file names are another story.
ebirman77 1 Posted October 4, 2017 Author Posted October 4, 2017 Structure can be worked with but file names are another story. Please ignore any inconsistencies, missing colons, and such. This is just to give you the picture Structure can be worked with but file names are another story. I agree, as you can see from the screenshot sometimes I am too lazy to rename the files. It is a work in progress.
ebr 15435 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 I think this would probably work if you make it a home videos library. Given your file names, I don't think any automated metadata search is going to work anyway.
ebirman77 1 Posted October 4, 2017 Author Posted October 4, 2017 Thank you all for your input. In the meantime I'll just stick to the recommended directory structure until the feature gets implemented, and try a more general solution like http://www.tagsistant.net/. I am optimistic. I still think that using hints in the form of %variables for metadata scraping would be nice. Gmusicbrowser offers something like that for filenames. Of course, with music you have other resources like Musicbrainz, acoustic fingerprints, and such.
dcook 280 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 You should use a program to automatically name your media in the correct format, Filebot for example is pretty common, and works on both Windows and Linux.
Deathsquirrel 743 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 You should use a program to automatically name your media in the correct format, Filebot for example is pretty common, and works on both Windows and Linux. Maybe?? There is absolutely nothing consistent in the naming of the folders of media files in his screenshots. That screams manual labor.
Solution Luke 38825 Posted October 5, 2017 Solution Posted October 5, 2017 that structure actually isn't too bad and i think it should probably at least partially work as a movies library. but yes as a home videos library it will be fine. 1
Untoten 303 Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 Why not use couchpotato/sickbeard etc to rename?
ebirman77 1 Posted November 7, 2017 Author Posted November 7, 2017 (edited) Why not use couchpotato/sickbeard etc to rename? I'll give a look at this but as Luke said, it sort of works with my current naming scheme (mess). Edited November 7, 2017 by ebirman77
Untoten 303 Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 I'll give a look at this but as Luke said, it sort of works with my current naming scheme (mess). Yes but might as well unify the naming convention before your collection grows to a scale that makes this a nightmare. I had that task recently with anything named the (movie name). I changed all to (movie name), The.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now