MySQL Support

[Dibbes 458]

And many, many companies have drowned by trying to take on too much too soon. We want to stay in our main lane and address our core audience (Personal Media Servers) right now. Who knows what the future holds but, right now, we still have a lot of work to do for just that audience.

You're not wrong... I really just would like to see Emby succeed

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[AxelAxel3 23]

I have many many movies, episodes, guide data, etc. And I have noticed my emby just keeps getting slower and slower as more gets put into it.

 

Typically I have found this to be the backend database or poor queries. I would assume the queries are good, so I would love to see a MS SQL backend! I've never worked with sqllite but I would assume since it's by Microsoft it would work similar to MSSQL and wouldn't be too hard to implement. Would love to see it!

[muhfugen 5]

this is simply due to a performance optimization we have implemented which gives us exclusive access to the DB.

If you have to maintain a write lock on the database the entire time, even when you have no intent of writing, as a "performance optimization", then that should tell you that you made the wrong choice for a database backend.

 

What you are asking for is concurrent access to the database which is not really related to the actual database implementation and is potentially a much more involved task than simply supporting a different back end implementation.

How? Transactions make these things easy. Am I missing something here? Or is this just due to technical debt, because no one ever thought more than a single thread in a single program would ever be accessing this database?

 

Also, you could easily take a snapshot of your database once a day and use that for these types of informational queries  .  That would be a much safer approach to such a thing regardless of the back end in use.

Thats a dirty hack and you know it.

Edited April 12, 2019 by muhfugen

[Carlo 4552]

I have many many movies, episodes, guide data, etc. And I have noticed my emby just keeps getting slower and slower as more gets put into it.

 

Typically I have found this to be the backend database or poor queries. I would assume the queries are good, so I would love to see a MS SQL backend! I've never worked with sqllite but I would assume since it's by Microsoft it would work similar to MSSQL and wouldn't be too hard to implement. Would love to see it!

Not that it matters, but SQLite isn't by Microsoft.  It a bit weird and has core developers with support by the SQLite Consortium.

[Dibbes 458]

I have many many movies, episodes, guide data, etc. And I have noticed my emby just keeps getting slower and slower as more gets put into it.

 

 

Wait until you import music, ebooks and comics for the extended family... before I split up and started running multiple instances of Emby, my normal library scan took over 7 hours (Server is an AMD 4core CPU, 32GB RAM and NVidia 780ti card with the OS and Emby database on a SSD) It had a little over 900k objects in the DB... when the scan was running, the server could only be used over the webpage, when more than 3 connections, the 4th would take minutes to load...

[shrouski 7]

Mine isn't even that big (15k items plus IPTV) and it can be terribly slow even loading the front page.

 

Those SQL's should be returning in a split second, but it takes 5-10 seconds.

[ebr 15667]

Those SQL's should be returning in a split second, but it takes 5-10 seconds.

 

There is usually a whole lot more than just a db query going on.  We aren't just a database front end .

[Dibbes 458]

There is usually a whole lot more than just a db query going on. We aren't just a database front end .

Very true! Then, a 70GB DB does impact performance though, doesn't it? I mean it is kept in a single file and the standard install location is the system drive where all kinds of other interesting things are going on too...

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[level20peon 12]

+1

[benoga 3]

+1

[Duffyx 25]

+1 as in "it would be cool to see this feature implemented".

Edited June 18, 2019 by Duffyx

[CChris 58]

+1

[byakuya32 24]

an sql database for all the metadata would be awsome rather than all the small little files.

[Luke 40082]

an sql database for all the metadata would be awsome rather than all the small little files.

 

Hi, what little files are you referring to?

[byakuya32 24]

I was referring to all the nfo files. For all the subtitles aswell

[Luke 40082]

I was referring to all the nfo files. For all the subtitles aswell

 

But nfo files live in the media directories. You can already turn that off and then everything will live in your emby database. In fact saving nfo is already off by default.

[byakuya32 24]

Thanks I was blind and didn't see that option

Edited July 9, 2019 by byakuya32

[laie_techie 15]

Family history is another interest of mine. The GEDCOM file format was designed to (easily) transmit data, but each program can store the facts / events / relationships any way it wants.

 

I view NFO as serving the same role as GEDCOM, just for media instead of family history. It's great for identifying basic metadata about the actual media file, but much too cumbersome to use directly for real time queries.

[ebr 15667]

Family history is another interest of mine. The GEDCOM file format was designed to (easily) transmit data, but each program can store the facts / events / relationships any way it wants.

 

I view NFO as serving the same role as GEDCOM, just for media instead of family history. It's great for identifying basic metadata about the actual media file, but much too cumbersome to use directly for real time queries.

 

Hi.  I think you've misunderstood this request.

 

Emby does not use your NFO files for real-time queries.  Emby is backed by a full database.  This request is just for us to use a different one than we are.

 

Thanks.

[laie_techie 15]

Hi.  I think you've misunderstood this request.

 

Emby does not use your NFO files for real-time queries.  Emby is backed by a full database.  This request is just for us to use a different one than we are.

 

Thanks.

byakuya32 was requesting using a database instead of the NFO. I was just comparing the two to another of my passions. Obviously Emby currently uses sqlite for realtime queries. The main request in this thread is to give admins an option of using a different DB (MySQL to be exact) to make it easier for 3rd party integration, and possible speed improvement.

[AxelAxel3 23]

 

 

... (MySQL to be exact) ...

I am hoping for Microsoft SQL actually [emoji16]

[byakuya32 24]

Microsoft Sql is amazing. You would then need to install Sql Express first and create the database for emby.

[level20peon 12]

I am hoping for Microsoft SQL actually [emoji16]

 

 

Microsoft Sql is amazing. You would then need to install Sql Express first and create the database for emby.

 

Maybe open your own feature request thread for that filthy, closed source, software of yours

[Zanson 2]

As someone who runs everything in docker and an unraid nfs, sqlite corruption is an issue because you can't lock with db file. I'm dealing with this in Plex right now and it's a nightmare, especially as my library grows.

 

I would love to run emby, but mitigating sqlite corruption is a real problem.

[jerrac 4]

So, this seems like the most up to date topic about asking for MySQL support.

 

I just had to delete library.db, yet again, in order to get new/changed files detected. Using MySQL, or PostgreSQL, would help minimize the risk of database corruption due to unexpected power outages or other issues.