Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ScottyT
Posted (edited)

Hello everyone,

I propose integrating a Tailscale-like functionality directly into Emby clients and servers to facilitate remote connections without the necessity of a non CGNAT connection or opening up home firewalls and the security concerns that entails. 

While starting a Tailscale client is relatively straightforward for most tech-savvy individuals, it becomes less intuitive on devices like TVs (where it can't be autorun), often causing confusion among users. To circumvent this, I typically set up a NanoPI as a proxy for remote users, directing their Emby client to it. However, if the open sourced Tailscale client were integrated into Emby, clients could transparently connect from any location with an internet connection.

I understand that this integration would require significant effort, but I believe it would be a highly utilized and defining Premiere feature,  attracting users from other Emby alternatives.

Running the Emby server itself with the linuxserver.io docker mod is already straightforward, and the server can be easily referred to by a simple name rather than by an IP address or a lengthy FQDN. https://tailscale.dev/blog/docker-mod-tailscale

Anyway, food for thought. Keep up the good work.

Edited by ScottyT
url
Posted

Hi, the problem is this can’t be integrated into the web app, Roku, smart TV apps. It’s really only possible on Android, windows, and maybe Apple.

 So given that, that would lead to an inconsistent experience. It’s better in my opinion to pursue improvements that can be used universally.

ScottyT
Posted

Hi,

Yeah that's understood but a shame nonetheless. I do see most devices can run WebAssembly so that may always be an option?

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Sure, I suppose that can't be ruled out.

  • Like 1
  • 6 months later...
rcsnoopdog
Posted
On 22/03/2024 at 19:52, ScottyT said:

Hello everyone,

I propose integrating a Tailscale-like functionality directly into Emby clients and servers to facilitate remote connections without the necessity of a non CGNAT connection or opening up home firewalls and the security concerns that entails. 

While starting a Tailscale client is relatively straightforward for most tech-savvy individuals, it becomes less intuitive on devices like TVs (where it can't be autorun), often causing confusion among users. To circumvent this, I typically set up a NanoPI as a proxy for remote users, directing their Emby client to it. However, if the open sourced Tailscale client were integrated into Emby, clients could transparently connect from any location with an internet connection.

I understand that this integration would require significant effort, but I believe it would be a highly utilized and defining Premiere feature,  attracting users from other Emby alternatives.

Running the Emby server itself with the linuxserver.io docker mod is already straightforward, and the server can be easily referred to by a simple name rather than by an IP address or a lengthy FQDN. https://tailscale.dev/blog/docker-mod-tailscale

Anyway, food for thought. Keep up the good work.

Hello Rich here

I have been looking to use Tailscale but i am a bit stupid when it comes to network issues, I need TAILSCALE to bypass cgNAT for remote access, would a free account on here work for me, i have windows pc connected direct to router & want to give remote access to fiends & family,  i have about 5 different households i want to give remote access to with probably 4 or 5 tv's in each & maybe loads of phones & tablets, will i be able to do that with a free account, also what is NanoPi because when i googled it i got the impression it was a piece of equipment i would have to pay money for?

Neminem
Posted

Hard reality check...

Self hosting vs pay 5$ for a static ip.

1) Self hosting

Do you know what you doing ?

Do you need a NanoPi or do you have a work around ?

Do you want to educate your self ?

Do you know where to go when it breaks ?

2) pay 5$ for a static ip.

You have someone to blame.

You can call them if its not working.

 

but then again you should weigh it.

pros vs con. paid vs self ( someone to call )

Free almost vs paid. Its on you.

 

 

rcsnoopdog
Posted

I'm convinced static ip here i come, thanks Neminem

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...