Jump to content

Recommended Posts

rodainas
Posted
6 minutes ago, mw420blazeit said:

the mpv stats shown are for the high10 file

thats not high10.

pixel format is 8 bit

NV12 yuv pixel format. YUV 4:2:0 image with a plane of 8 bit Y samples followed by an interleaved U/V plane containing 8 bit 2x2 subsampled colour difference samples.

This is high10

image.png.8146e7160f28204ae38151b0ec220faf.png

mw420blazeit
Posted
2 minutes ago, rodainas said:

thats not high10.

pixel format is 8 bit

NV12 yuv pixel format. YUV 4:2:0 image with a plane of 8 bit Y samples followed by an interleaved U/V plane containing 8 bit 2x2 subsampled colour difference samples.

This is high10

image.png.8146e7160f28204ae38151b0ec220faf.png

Well emby reports the same file as high10 so I don't know 

image.png

Posted

That might imply there's a metadata issue with either the video or the container. Which also might explain why emby is doing what it's doing. Try remuxing it in mkvtoolnix.

 

 

 

Carlo
Posted

If you have or can install MediaInfo, it would be nice to see how this program reports this.

mw420blazeit
Posted
2 hours ago, cayars said:

If you have or can install MediaInfo, it would be nice to see how this program reports this.

mkv_MediaInfo.txtI guess mpv android is giving wrong information cause everywhere else it says 10bit
but then how is mpv able to HW decode it properly
 

Posted

Play it directly in mpv and not through emby as an external player. What do the stats tell you?

Posted

The TV app is transcoding because this is a generic box so we're assuming it cannot handle profile level 5.1.  We can try adjusting that assumption and see if it causes problems elsewhere.

Posted
1 hour ago, ebr said:

The TV app is transcoding because this is a generic box so we're assuming it cannot handle profile level 5.1.  We can try adjusting that assumption and see if it causes problems elsewhere.

Wouldn't it be better to ask the hardware to tell its capabilities? Is that even possible?

Just wondering...

Posted
20 hours ago, neik said:

Wouldn't it be better to ask the hardware to tell its capabilities? Is that even possible?

Yes and we try to do that in most cases.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, ebr said:

Yes and we try to do that in most cases.

Why not here, special reason?

Edited by neik

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...