dext 0 Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 Hi, I had Emby working perfectly for a couple of months, but then after reboot I'm getting this exceptions pasted at the end of the post. I'm couple of hours into this problem, I can't find anything relevant on the Internet. I have triple checked all permissions I could think off. All mount points are for sure rw, not ro. I've even tried to recreate PROGRAM_DATA directory - no change. The exception doesn't give me any info where the problem actually is, so I'm lost at this point. Could someone please give my some direction what to try next? I'm using Arch Linux and natively installed emby-server package (no docker). Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz systemd[1]: Started Emby brings together your videos, music, photos, and live television.. Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: Error GlobalExceptionHandler: UnhandledException Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: System.AggregateException: System.AggregateException: One or more errors occurred. (Read-only file system) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: ---> System.IO.IOException: Read-only file system Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.IO.FileSystem.CreateDirectory(String fullPath) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.IO.Directory.CreateDirectory(String path) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at Emby.Server.Implementations.Logging.FileLogger..ctor(String path) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at Emby.Server.Implementations.Logging.SimpleLogManager.ReloadLogger(LogSeverity severity, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: --- End of inner exception stack trace --- Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.WaitAllCore(Task[] tasks, Int32 millisecondsTimeout, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.WaitAll(Task[] tasks) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at EmbyServer.Program.Main(String[] args) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: Source: System.Private.CoreLib Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: TargetSite: Void ThrowAggregateException(System.Collections.Generic.List`1[System.Exception]) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: InnerException: System.IO.IOException: Read-only file system Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: Source: System.IO.FileSystem Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: TargetSite: Void CreateDirectory(System.String) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.IO.FileSystem.CreateDirectory(String fullPath) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.IO.Directory.CreateDirectory(String path) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at Emby.Server.Implementations.Logging.FileLogger..ctor(String path) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at Emby.Server.Implementations.Logging.SimpleLogManager.ReloadLogger(LogSeverity severity, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: Unhandled exception. System.AggregateException: One or more errors occurred. (Read-only file system) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: ---> System.IO.IOException: Read-only file system Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.IO.FileSystem.CreateDirectory(String fullPath) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.IO.Directory.CreateDirectory(String path) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at Emby.Server.Implementations.Logging.FileLogger..ctor(String path) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at Emby.Server.Implementations.Logging.SimpleLogManager.ReloadLogger(LogSeverity severity, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: --- End of inner exception stack trace --- Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.WaitAllCore(Task[] tasks, Int32 millisecondsTimeout, CancellationToken cancellationToken) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.WaitAll(Task[] tasks) Jan 04 08:15:27 vaduz emby-server[24993]: at EmbyServer.Program.Main(String[] args) Jan 04 08:15:28 vaduz systemd[1]: emby-server.service: Main process exited, code=dumped, status=6/ABRT Jan 04 08:15:28 vaduz systemd[1]: emby-server.service: Failed with result 'core-dump'.
Q-Droid 989 Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 What user:group owns /var/lib/emby? Does it match the Emby server runtime user? Was a new log created in /var/lib/emby/logs? If so please attach it. Was your initial setup following this info? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Emby
dext 0 Posted January 4, 2021 Author Posted January 4, 2021 Thanks for the response. I did follow Arch Linux wiki, with some changes: I don't use "/var/lib/emby". Instead I set "PROGRAM_DATA=/srv/emby" in /etc/conf.d/emby-server Instead of "media" group, I used "emby" /srv/emby/logs have only old logs. This is a server, which I never touch. Only thing that happened, was system update + reboot. Which for Arch Linux could mean a lot, but I didn't do anything with config or file permissions. I see in logs last time Emby worked was 26 of October 2020. Maybe Emby had some major release? ps aux | grep emby # quick, before crash emby 26188 7.6 0.5 3054372 41784 ? Ssl 14:16 0:00 dotnet /usr/lib/emby-server/EmbyServer.dll -programdata /srv/emby -ffdetect /usr/bin/ffdetect-emby -ffmpeg /usr/bin/ffmpeg-emby -ffprobe /usr/bin/ffprobe-emby -restartexitcode 3 cat /etc/conf.d/emby-server | grep PROGRAM_DATA PROGRAM_DATA=/srv/emby ll /srv/ | grep emby drwxr-xr-x 12 emby emby 4096 Jan 4 08:11 emby/ # just to be sure, again: chmod u+rwX,g+rwX,o+rX -R /srv/emby chown emby:emby -R /srv/emby # this works: su - emby touch /srv/emby/test123
Q-Droid 989 Posted January 4, 2021 Posted January 4, 2021 (edited) Was /srv/emby explicitly allowed in ReadWritePaths before in systemd for the service? Since you're deviating from default is it possibly needed now? Perhaps an Arch update changed the behavior... I always think of something after I post. Is the emby user home dir also /srv/emby? Edited January 4, 2021 by Q-Droid
dext 0 Posted January 4, 2021 Author Posted January 4, 2021 Thank you very much for help. You were right, it was Systemd's sandboxing. I didn't have it configured at all, and looks like it started to be enforced with some update. I hate Systemd with all my heart from the first time I've seen it, and this hatred grows with every such case, and interaction with their useless documentation. But that's another topic
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now