Jump to content

Can't get HW Transcoding working in Docker with Nvidia


Recommended Posts

EODCrafter
Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, softworkz said:

I don't want to disturb everybody being happy and satisfied already, but for clarity and future readers:

  • CUDA 11.x is not a requirement. The current minimum is CUDA 8.2
    The minimum required driver versions for this are:
    • Linux: 396.24 or newer
    • Windows: 397.93 or newer
  • You never need to install the CUDA Toolkit!
    That multi-Gigabyte download is for developers only
  • The installation instructions are always the same (like documented in the KB):
    • Go to nvidia.com
    • Go to driver download 
    • Follow the instructions

 

Always follow the instructions on the Nvidia site, even when the installed driver version appears to be sufficient!
Many Linux distributions include a subset of the Nvidia drivers only (e.g. without CUDA), so you cannot judge by the driver version only.

Why did updating that Massive CUDA work for me when my NVIDIA Version was already 460.XX? CUDA Version was reported as 11.2.

Capture.PNG

I can only assume that the run file NVIDIA Provides is the correct way to update the Drivers....image.png.6f6fd3eab1a07d2b98b4b39e9e520252.png

Edited by EODCrafter
Posted
4 minutes ago, EODCrafter said:

Why did updating that Massive CUDA work for me when my NVIDIA Version was already 460.XX? CUDA Version was reported as 11.2.

59 minutes ago, softworkz said:

Many Linux distributions include a subset of the Nvidia drivers only (e.g. without CUDA), so you cannot judge by the driver version only.

EODCrafter
Posted
1 minute ago, softworkz said:

 

That SS was taken Prior to the Docker Transcoding working.

 

EODCrafter
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, softworkz said:

 

I had CUDA 11.2....So why didn't it work? Oh well, too much for average users to comprehend, I guess. it works now...is there any way to remove the developers toolkit and keep CUDA 11.3?

Edited by EODCrafter
Posted
Just now, EODCrafter said:

I had CUDA 11.2....So why didn't it work? Oh well, too much for average users to comprehend, I guess.

I can't tell exactly why. Either there Distro-driver includes only partial CUDA components or the info display simply displays the version of CUDA that is normally bundled with the driver..

  • Like 1
Posted

Most likely it is about some component that is closed source or where the Linux guys don't like the license and then they just don't include it in their package...well, it's Linux..

EODCrafter
Posted
1 minute ago, softworkz said:

Most likely it is about some component that is closed source or where the Linux guys don't like the license and then they just don't include it in their package...well, it's Linux..

I uninstalled the Toolkit and it removed NVIDIA and broke Emby, so I'm reinstalling NVIDIA...

  • Like 1
EODCrafter
Posted

Apparently I can't get away from the CUDA toolkit. Just installing NVIDIA left me with a Blank Screen and When I dropped to prompt and installed `apt install cuda` it installed it all again :(

Posted
2 minutes ago, EODCrafter said:

Apparently I can't get away from the CUDA toolkit. Just installing NVIDIA left me with a Blank Screen and When I dropped to prompt and installed `apt install cuda` it installed it all again :(

Did you follow the installation instruction from the Nvidia website?

EODCrafter
Posted

When I first installed the Docker, It worked, then it didn't work...Update CUDA...It Works. I can't satisfy your questions beyond that

Posted
21 minutes ago, EODCrafter said:

My Card is not listed there...it is listed here and yes, I followed the instructions, pretty much Idiot proof TBH....https://us.driverscollection.com/?H=GeForce GTX 1050&By=NVidia&SS=Linux x86

Hmpf, nobody said something about "driverscollection"...

This is where you go to:

5 hours ago, softworkz said:

And there it will look like this:

image.png.a8bc6dc371943ae8af6bcdd5aa8678f5.png

 

EODCrafter
Posted

Is this what Luke was talking about? image.thumb.png.ec4cbceb3e127b09f3132cd2b4ba3be3.png

 

Posted (edited)

No. 

And it doesn't really matter which one you pick. 

Edited by softworkz
EODCrafter
Posted
Just now, softworkz said:

No. 

It doesn't really matter which one you pick. 

I'll try it once again with that file and see if it works without toolkit.

EODCrafter
Posted

image.png.c609ce9174829224935665158085f80f.png

EODCrafter
Posted

I have to reboot....image.png.87fa1990914adfb79f0e7cc861e53593.png

 

EODCrafter
Posted

image.thumb.png.7da2f22e9a87858577b7891d22bf2f2c.png

EODCrafter
Posted

image.thumb.png.24e66eff101b39c527a52826c0ef631a.png

EODCrafter
Posted

AFAIK, I have to boot now to Command Prompt.

EODCrafter
Posted

Trying this.....image.png.841f51dab54e41f6af034f22ae39fa7a.png

EODCrafter
Posted

image.png.4c1d4572ea4371ba91a884fe6133d34b.png

EODCrafter
Posted

image.png.814f0e92698fa68c837bdc6a7946c5c2.png

EODCrafter
Posted

Where do I go from here? image.png.26b696d2d421b945eb9821336244c89d.png

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...