Option to Disable Enhanced Images

[swhitmore 781]

Hey, I love using Cover Art on MBC, but it looks really out of place on MBT. It would be great to have the option to disable CA treatments. Cheers.

[ebr 16169]

I'd rather not see this in the htpc clients. I think if you don't want it in the htpc clients then you just won't install it. Having an option to turn it off in the main client is just apt to cause confusion or make people think it isn't working.

[swhitmore 781]

I don't think it would be too confusing if it wasn't disabled by default. Now that MB has moved to a client/server setup, I think it would be rare that you would want each client's treatments looking the same. It would be awesome if CA could create profiles based on a specific client, but I'm guessing that would be a lot more work. Or would it?

[Luke 42077]

the clients would have to add a param to image url's to identify themselves. that's not a big deal though. having all of those additional configurations though will add both cpu and storage pressure on the server though, because the image processing will occur more often and the cache will be larger. but i suppose if the user is aware of that they can make that decision.

[swhitmore 781]

I know for me it's not a big deal, since I have a dedicate server. I'm sure if it was made aware, people would be fine with it.

[ebr 16169]

I'm not in favor of adding per-client configurations in CA.  Configuration for CA is already complex and that would explode it.

[Redshirt 1487]

Last thing I want to see is a plugin setup too complex. I think per-client treatments is way beyond OCD.