Jump to content

Emby Server Ver 3.5.3.0 Problem


Recommended Posts

Posted

1) I noticed that approximately every 24h the server consumes the memory of the machine totally (I am currently 32gb on a dedicated server). to solve this problem? 2) I'm using EmbyCon and constantly the movie folders and / or series are empty. In some cases errors appear. Examples: URL error: Internal Server Error. Connection Error timed out

Posted

Hi there, can you please attach the Emby Server log? Thanks !

Posted

this happen only on movies lib (have 1856 movies)

if i open a series open normal and fast 

 

if i change exibition pages for 100 (per page), i cant move to second page on embycon.

any help?

Posted

Can you attach the log to this posting? I don't really trust that website. Thanks.

Posted

great, thanks. And yes, there are some really slow responses in this log. This should perform much better with the upcoming 3.6 release of Emby Server. Thanks.

Posted

When will this release be released? And in the meantime, what do I do?

Posted

great, thanks. And yes, there are some really slow responses in this log. This should perform much better with the upcoming 3.6 release of Emby Server. Thanks.

I also have a problem with security measures for remote access. All options for forcing remote connections to use HTTPS do not work. Both HTTP and HTTPS are mapped to the extranet through unup, and HTTP ports can be accessed through remote addresses, and successfully logged in. Configuration that forcing remote connections to use HTTPS does not work。

Happy2Play
Posted

I also have a problem with security measures for remote access. All options for forcing remote connections to use HTTPS do not work. Both HTTP and HTTPS are mapped to the extranet through unup, and HTTP ports can be accessed through remote addresses, and successfully logged in. Configuration that forcing remote connections to use HTTPS does not work。

 

It works if you port forward instead of UPNP/port mapping, correct?  To me there has never been security via UPNP.

Posted

It works if you port forward instead of UPNP/port mapping, correct?  To me there has never been security via UPNP.

I set up a secure connection mode for all remote connections, but the HTTP port was still mapped to UPnP,This is not the result I want, the correct result is that the HTTP port will not be mapped to UPnP

Happy2Play
Posted (edited)

I set up a secure connection mode for all remote connections, but the HTTP port was still mapped to UPnP,This is not the result I want, the correct result is that the HTTP port will not be mapped to UPnP

 

But http port is broadcasting upnp on your local network and your Router is allowing that port to be accessible from the WAN.  This is why UPNP really has no security, UPNP is a all or nothing protocal, it has nothing to do with Emby it is the protocol itself.

 

Disabling UPNP resolves this issue, correct.

Edited by Happy2Play
Posted

I also have a problem with security measures for remote access. All options for forcing remote connections to use HTTPS do not work. Both HTTP and HTTPS are mapped to the extranet through unup, and HTTP ports can be accessed through remote addresses, and successfully logged in. Configuration that forcing remote connections to use HTTPS does not work。

 

Have you setup HTTPS with an SSL certificate?

Posted

Have you setup HTTPS with an SSL certificate?

Yes, I installed the SSL certificate

Posted

But http port is broadcasting upnp on your local network and your Router is allowing that port to be accessible from the WAN.  This is why UPNP really has no security, UPNP is a all or nothing protocal, it has nothing to do with Emby it is the protocol itself.

 

Disabling UPNP resolves this issue, correct.

When the secure connection mode is set to be required for all remote connections, remote connections should only use HTTPS instead of http. The solution is to close the network mapping for only http ports, not all of them.

Posted

Have you setup HTTPS with an SSL certificate?

I mean: in the case that security mode is set to remote connections, HTTP ports should not be accessed by the public network, only HTTPS ports, or only open HTTPS ports. Or HTTP ports are not mapped by UPnP

Posted

I mean: in the case that security mode is set to remote connections, HTTP ports should not be accessed by the public network, only HTTPS ports, or only open HTTPS ports. Or HTTP ports are not mapped by UPnP

 

I understand, but you have to first setup SSL before you can use the HTTPS port. Did you do that?

Posted (edited)

I understand, but you have to first setup SSL before you can use the HTTPS port. Did you do that?

I've configured SSL correctly and can access it properly. my concern is why HTTP ports can be accessed on the public network.

Edited by juebanlin
Posted

You need to set the secure connections mode to required. Have you done that? If you've done that and you think you're still seeing connections over HTTP, then please go over an example and attach the information requested in how to report a problem. Thanks !

Posted

You need to set the secure connections mode to required. Have you done that? If you've done that and you think you're still seeing connections over HTTP, then please go over an example and attach the information requested in how to report a problem. Thanks !

This problem exists in version 3.5, and then I don't have it in version 3.6.

Happy2Play
Posted (edited)

I've configured SSL correctly and can access it properly. my concern is why HTTP ports can be accessed on the public network.

 

 

How are you connecting to your server?  There is currently no redirect for http://app.emby.media.

 

I don't use UPNP and entering http://servername.com:8096 redirects me to https://servername.com:8920.

Edited by Happy2Play
Posted

how i can install 3.6 server version? please. i need this fix 

Posted

Have you explored the download page of our website for instructions on beta releases? thanks.

Posted

my problem was the one reported at the beginning of the topic with excessive memory usage. with this version the problem is solved? if yes, is it enough that I overlap the installation? my library and users will keep up?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...