Jump to content

Coming from Plex can't remote :(


Go to solution Solved by hexluther,

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

As the title says, I'm coming from Plex, thinking of switching but I cannot for the life of me figure out why its not letting me remote in externally... 

 

I've gone through https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Wiki/wiki/Connectivity 

 

  • I'm on xfinity
  • I've forwarded port 8096 TCP for both ipv4 AND ipv6 (canyouseeme.org SUCCESS)
  • I've allowed inbound/outbound on port 8096 TCP windows firewall 
  • Also allowed app access vial windows firewall

I'm not sure what else I can try... 

 

I have nothing set up for Plex and I can connect with no issue :(

 

Any help is appreciated, thanks in advance! 

Edited by nando99
Posted

Hi, how are you trying to connect externally? What happens when you try? Thanks !

Posted

I've tried to add the server after signing to emby.media (using remote url) and get the server cannot be found error.

 

I've also tried going directly to the remote url and get: internal error - server connection terminated

 
thanks!
  • Solution
Posted

Windows seems sometimes finicky with FW.  In some cases I would delete the incoming rule (shouldn't need outgoing individually) or rules associated with the program, then choose either program or port scope, not both.  Also, I battled just recently with my pfSense, certain that "it" was having an issue, where a TightVNC rule just wouldn't jive right.  A port scanner (same you used and others) would show open, but, it simply wouldn't reach the host.  Turns out, woops, I placed the wrong destination IP, the one I was certain (for nearly an hour) was "all correct and it has to be this !@#$ pfSense box."   Yeah.. sigh. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Can you access from other devices inside your home network?

  • Like 1
Posted

yep, from my PC using remote url, from my Android phone and from the Nvidia shield...

Posted

Windows seems sometimes finicky with FW.  In some cases I would delete the incoming rule (shouldn't need outgoing individually) or rules associated with the program, then choose either program or port scope, not both.  Also, I battled just recently with my pfSense, certain that "it" was having an issue, where a TightVNC rule just wouldn't jive right.  A port scanner (same you used and others) would show open, but, it simply wouldn't reach the host.  Turns out, woops, I placed the wrong destination IP, the one I was certain (for nearly an hour) was "all correct and it has to be this !@#$ pfSense box."   Yeah.. sigh.

 

thanks, I'll try starting over with WF

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

that seem to do the trick hexluther - thanks! 

Posted

Thanks for reporting back !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...