Jump to content

Server - Security


Recommended Posts

Posted

Could we get an "No password required if connecting from the same subnet" checkbox added to accounts please?

 

Seems a total hassle to use a password everytime I connect.....even when I am on the machine hosting the server!

 

This will help people who use emby internally and externally

Posted

We already have this.

 

Set up an Easy PIN for the user and leave it blank.

  • Like 1
anderbytes
Posted

@@Luke and @@ebr, I'll take the oportunity to suggest an improvement to this topic.

 

Can you allow us to configure (in each user) if he is seen or visible in internal / external networks?

 

It bothers me that outside my home network anyone can connect my IP and see my users (and profile photos, username...)

From internal network, there's no problem. But outside, we should be able to hide it and only accept manual input of username.

  • Like 2
Posted

@@Luke and @@ebr, I'll take the oportunity to suggest an improvement to this topic.

 

Can you allow us to configure (in each user) if he is seen or visible in internal / external networks?

 

It bothers me that outside my home network anyone can connect my IP and see my users (and profile photos, username...)

From internal network, there's no problem. But outside, we should be able to hide it and only accept manual input of username.

 

Good luck, I made this request before but it has never gone anywhere.

Posted

have you guys seen this?

 

56ca9b6795f5c_Untitled.png

Koleckai Silvestri
Posted (edited)

have you guys seen this?

 

56ca9b6795f5c_Untitled.png

Doesn't satisfy the request. They want users visible on the LAN and all users hidden on the WAN.

 

Makes sense. When you display a user selection screen on the WAN, you give hackers half the security key to infiltrate your network.

Edited by Koleckai Silvestri
  • Like 2
Posted

Understood, but it's not as if they have zero options right now. If you want to at least get them hidden, there is a way to do it.

Koleckai Silvestri
Posted

Just lowers the WAF significantly.

anderbytes
Posted

Understood, but it's not as if they have zero options right now. If you want to at least get them hidden, there is a way to do it.

 

Luke, that's no mandatory security issue. Ok?

 

I just wanted to have the ability to optimize security and privacy (in external) without having to give up on convenience (in internal).

Happy2Play
Posted

That is the black hole of security, it takes away convenience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...