AlexLai 1 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Emby already has a well-structured People metadata system, including actor images, credits, and individual person pages. However, from a UI/UX perspective, actors are only accessible through item detail pages and lack a dedicated browsing entry point. ## Current Limitations 1. **Deep navigation path** * Current flow: Item → Actor → Person page * No direct way to browse all actors 2. **No actor-centric browsing** * Users cannot explore the library by actors * This limits content discovery, especially in actor-driven libraries 3. **Underutilized metadata** * People data is already well-maintained * But lacks a corresponding gallery-style UI --- ## Proposed Feature ### 1. Add “People” as a top-level library section * Alongside Movies / TV Shows / Collections * Entry opens a grid-style actor gallery --- ### 2. Actor Gallery (Poster Wall) Include: * Grid layout with actor images * Sorting options: * Number of appearances * Recently added * Alphabetical * Filtering: * By media type (Movies / TV) * Tags / Favorites * Search support --- ### 3. Optional Enhancements * Actor statistics (appearance count, last added) * Categorized filmography display --- ## Implementation Feasibility This feature should be relatively lightweight to implement: * People metadata already exists * Requires: * Aggregated People API endpoint * Frontend gallery view * Can reuse existing poster wall UI components --- ## User Value * Improves content discovery * Enhances UI completeness * Aligns with user expectations from other platforms * Particularly valuable for actor-centric libraries --- ## Summary This is a **low-cost, high-impact** improvement that leverages existing data and significantly enhances user experience. Thank you for your ongoing development of Emby. I believe this enhancement would bring meaningful improvements to both usability and feature completeness, and align well with user expectations. I sincerely hope it can be considered for inclusion in a future release.
AlexLai 1 Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 12 hours ago, ebr said: Thank you for providing the link to the previous discussion. I think this feature could be added, but it should be disabled by default, allowing users who need it to enable it themselves. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now