HtRabbit 11 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 is it possible to have a movie listed under 2 names File name(scraped)+ an alias IE i would like to search for 1984 , yet scrapers return it as nineteen eighty-four
Luke 42077 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 HI, this is not currently possible, but this question has come up before and it's possible for future updates. Thanks.
pwhodges 2012 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 I just made them the same by editing the metadata to my (single) preference; it happens rarely enough to be no big imposition. The other case I have is the 39/Thirty-Nine Steps. I don't think you can have two entries for the one film, though; you could combine the two versions of the name so that either search would bring it up, I suppose. Paul
brothom 177 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 (edited) 5 hours ago, pwhodges said: I just made them the same by editing the metadata to my (single) preference; it happens rarely enough to be no big imposition. The other case I have is the 39/Thirty-Nine Steps. I don't think you can have two entries for the one film, though; you could combine the two versions of the name so that either search would bring it up, I suppose. Paul 51st state is also one of those dual-title movies. Known in the US as "Formula 51" because they were afraid it would confuse the American populus lol. I was actually suprised to learn that with Nineteen Eighty-Four | 1984, the "1984" is the stylised variant. Who knew! Personally I'd prefer the following: 51st State | Formula 51 Nineteen Eighty-Four | 1984 The Thirty-Nine Steps | The 39 Steps Where the original title is followed by the stylised variant. But yes a separate field for "alternate title" could proof useful, especially considering some books and a LOT of media / songs that have duplicate names. "Radiohead - Street Spirit | Fade Out" to name a pretty famous one. Perhaps we can take a page from Radiohead's book and use their convention: 51st State (Formula 51) Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984) The Thirty-Nine Steps (The 39 Steps) Edited February 4 by brothom
pwhodges 2012 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 Putting (1984) as part of the name in that case could cause problems with other films of the book; I mean "Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984) (1954)" would blow Emby's mind, I suspect. Paul 1
Luke 42077 Posted February 4 Posted February 4 2 hours ago, pwhodges said: Putting (1984) as part of the name in that case could cause problems with other films of the book; I mean "Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984) (1954)" would blow Emby's mind, I suspect. Paul Tested that example it works fine.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now