Tophicles 39 Posted February 25, 2025 Posted February 25, 2025 I should say that even when this is globally applied to the library, it often misses hundreds that the manual, per object request completes successfully.
Luke 42078 Posted February 25, 2025 Posted February 25, 2025 4 hours ago, Tophicles said: I should say that even when this is globally applied to the library, it often misses hundreds that the manual, per object request completes successfully. Hi, they are the same process, so there is no difference. It’s more likely that you thought something wasn’t working due to the fact that you can’t monitor progress of it.
Tophicles 39 Posted February 25, 2025 Author Posted February 25, 2025 3 minutes ago, Luke said: Hi, they are the same process, so there is no difference. It’s more likely that you thought something wasn’t working due to the fact that you can’t monitor progress of it. Well, apart from the fact that I'm monitoring the log file directly and can watch what it's doing from there. The "library" refresh metadata (and replace images) didn't work for hundred or so series that I'm now doing by hand, individually. That was the reason for the "Replace all Images" shortcut request, it would save me hours of work lol.
Neminem 1519 Posted February 25, 2025 Posted February 25, 2025 Ok so what was the error, if it did not update ? And what metadata fetchers have you enabled ? And in what order ? How is your naming ? Devs would need logs @GrimReaperThis can't be FR, more a support call.
Happy2Play 9780 Posted February 25, 2025 Posted February 25, 2025 Unfortunately I believe you will have to wait for a full scan to finish. As it to a point does not just do everything sequentially from a initial scan.
Tophicles 39 Posted February 25, 2025 Author Posted February 25, 2025 1 minute ago, Happy2Play said: Unfortunately I believe you will have to wait for a full scan to finish. As it to a point does not just do everything sequentially from a initial scan. I did leave it for a day. I'm not trying to criticize the way the system scans, I'm just asking for the feasibility of including that shortcut along with the others on the poster hover, as it eliminates several steps.
Happy2Play 9780 Posted February 25, 2025 Posted February 25, 2025 Depends on how larger your library is as some system say they takes weeks for initial scans as reported elsewhere. I just takes time scaning and probing every item and querying every item from on provider site. But currently looks normal to me. 1
Neminem 1519 Posted February 25, 2025 Posted February 25, 2025 I would also use this folder naming for tv shows. Folder : 1923 (2022) [TvdbId=416491] Adding year and Tvdbid will help Emby search.
Tophicles 39 Posted February 25, 2025 Author Posted February 25, 2025 1 minute ago, Neminem said: I would also use this folder naming for tv shows. Folder : 1923 (2022) [TvdbId=416491] Adding year and Tvdbid will help Emby search. Noted, but it doesn't seem to affect the search when executed manually.
Happy2Play 9780 Posted February 25, 2025 Posted February 25, 2025 13 minutes ago, Tophicles said: Noted, but it doesn't seem to affect the search when executed manually. Hard to say as it could be in a queue do to other processing happening per your log.
Tophicles 39 Posted February 25, 2025 Author Posted February 25, 2025 1 minute ago, Happy2Play said: Hard to say as it could be in a queue do to other processing happening per your log. Yes, that could be for sure.
Neminem 1519 Posted February 25, 2025 Posted February 25, 2025 You did not specify if this in enabled in you library. Since that will slow down every this, a lot.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now