GrimReaper Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 How can we get item logo back where it was before? I find the new position, quite frankly, horrendous. It's minimized, basically goes unnoticed, it's placed just above the poster that extremely likely already has that same logo - bigger and more noticeable, can't fathom what was the reason to move it there in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrbee99 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 What ? Where ? How ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReaper Posted June 12 Author Share Posted June 12 (edited) 5 minutes ago, arrbee99 said: What ? Where ? How ? Edit: Edited June 12 by GrimReaper Screenshot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanbuff Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 I'm still on beta, do you have a screenshot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReaper Posted June 12 Author Share Posted June 12 2 minutes ago, seanbuff said: I'm still on beta, do you have a screenshot? Just did it in previous post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanbuff Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Yeah that's no good at all. With that location logos will always be restricted in size making some wide text almost unreadable. Can't understand the reason for that change either Never saw anyone complain about logo placement before. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReaper Posted June 12 Author Share Posted June 12 (edited) 6 minutes ago, seanbuff said: Yeah that's no good at all. With that location logos will always be restricted in size making some wide text almost unreadable. Can't understand the reason for that change either Never saw anyone complain about logo placement before. Bigger logos look even more like an unwanted child. Edited June 12 by GrimReaper Screenshots 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrbee99 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Ah OK. I got rid of the poster anyway, so... Still, be interesting to know what it like before. Does look a bit on the nano end of the scale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanbuff Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 6 minutes ago, GrimReaper said: Bigger logos look even more like an unwanted child. That's what I was afraid of ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrbee99 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Maybe a bit much (or a bit little) even for me - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceboy Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 mine looks slightly different/better. no css Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanbuff Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 37 minutes ago, Spaceboy said: mine looks slightly different/better. no css Is that from 4.7.2.0 stable? Looks like the previous layout, still active on the current beta 4.8.0.0 version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fillidill Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Yes, please revert this! It's a horrible design decision to be frank. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceboy Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 25 minutes ago, seanbuff said: Is that from 4.7.2.0 stable? yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReaper Posted June 12 Author Share Posted June 12 2 hours ago, Spaceboy said: mine looks slightly different/better. no css That's because you're using logo as title. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrbee99 Posted June 14 Share Posted June 14 Still microscopic in 4.8.0.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReaper Posted June 15 Author Share Posted June 15 3 hours ago, arrbee99 said: Still microscopic in 4.8.0.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrbee99 Posted June 17 Share Posted June 17 @Luke would you please be kind enough to put the logo back where it was previously. Thanks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrbee99 Posted June 24 Share Posted June 24 Another server update, no change. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlosLima Posted June 24 Share Posted June 24 Regardless of the size I didn't like this logo design in place of the text. I live in Brazil and I always use the title of the film in the original language of the production, therefore, Italian, Spanish, French etc. and the logo is always in English, so I chose to keep it in text, which is even more stylish than the logo. , as we already have the logo in several other parts of the homepage and details screen. It's just a matter of personal taste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReaper Posted June 24 Author Share Posted June 24 2 minutes ago, CarlosLima said: Regardless of the size I didn't like this logo design in place of the text. I live in Brazil and I always use the title of the film in the original language of the production, therefore, Italian, Spanish, French etc. and the logo is always in English, so I chose to keep it in text, which is even more stylish than the logo. , as we already have the logo in several other parts of the homepage and details screen. It's just a matter of personal taste. I have a feeling you've missed the point of this topic: it is not about Logo as title but logo placement itself, and NO, you don't have logo anywhere on the detail page any more save miniscule one in header bar. That is the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlosLima Posted June 24 Share Posted June 24 Oops, fact. One of the images confused me. Sorry for the out of context comment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlosLima Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Coming back here to join the group that didn't approve this change in logo position and I'm rooting for the reversal. Thanks 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimReaper Posted July 2 Author Share Posted July 2 On 6/12/2022 at 3:28 AM, GrimReaper said: How can we get item logo back where it was before? On 6/12/2022 at 3:43 AM, seanbuff said: Yeah that's no good at all. With that location logos will always be restricted in size making some wide text almost unreadable. Can't understand the reason for that change either On 6/12/2022 at 11:22 AM, fillidill said: Yes, please revert this! It's a horrible design decision to be frank. On 6/17/2022 at 11:46 PM, arrbee99 said: @Luke would you please be kind enough to put the logo back where it was previously. Thanks. 8 hours ago, CarlosLima said: Coming back here to join the group that didn't approve this change in logo position and I'm rooting for the reversal. Thanks @Luke, some comment would be welcomed. Thank you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlosLima Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 Due to the preference of some for the logo in the original position, maybe a CSS/HTML can solve the issue and thus serve everyone without changing what was defined by the development. I would like a code to restore the logo to the position and size it has always been used for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now