4.7.2.0 Item Logo placement

[GrimReaper 4141]

How can we get item logo back where it was before? I find the new position, quite frankly, horrendous. It's minimized, basically goes unnoticed, it's placed just above the poster that extremely likely already has that same logo - bigger and more noticeable, can't fathom what was the reason to move it there in the first place? 

 

[arrbee99 1712]

What ? Where ? How ?

[GrimReaper 4141]

5 minutes ago, arrbee99 said:

What ? Where ? How ?

Edit:

 

Edited June 12, 2022 by GrimReaper
Screenshot

[seanbuff 1147]

I'm still on beta, do you have a screenshot? 

[GrimReaper 4141]

2 minutes ago, seanbuff said:

I'm still on beta, do you have a screenshot? 

Just did it in previous post. 

[seanbuff 1147]

Yeah that's no good at all. With that location logos will always be restricted in size making some wide text almost unreadable. Can't understand the reason for that change either 

Never saw anyone complain about logo placement before.

[GrimReaper 4141]

6 minutes ago, seanbuff said:

Yeah that's no good at all. With that location logos will always be restricted in size making some wide text almost unreadable. Can't understand the reason for that change either 

Never saw anyone complain about logo placement before.

Bigger logos look even more like an unwanted child.

 

Edited June 12, 2022 by GrimReaper
Screenshots

[arrbee99 1712]

Ah OK. I got rid of the poster anyway, so...

Still, be interesting to know what it like before.

Does look a bit on the nano end of the scale.

[seanbuff 1147]

6 minutes ago, GrimReaper said:

Bigger logos look even more like an unwanted child.

 

That's what I was afraid of ...

[arrbee99 1712]

Maybe a bit much (or a bit little) even for me -

[Spaceboy 2565]

mine looks slightly different/better. no css

[seanbuff 1147]

37 minutes ago, Spaceboy said:

mine looks slightly different/better. no css

Is that from 4.7.2.0 stable? Looks like the previous layout, still active on the current beta 4.8.0.0 version.

[fillidill 170]

Yes, please revert this! It's a horrible design decision to be frank. 

[Spaceboy 2565]

25 minutes ago, seanbuff said:

Is that from 4.7.2.0 stable?

yes

[GrimReaper 4141]

2 hours ago, Spaceboy said:

mine looks slightly different/better. no css

That's because you're using logo as title. 

[arrbee99 1712]

Still microscopic in 4.8.0.1

 

[GrimReaper 4141]

3 hours ago, arrbee99 said:

Still microscopic in 4.8.0.1

 

[arrbee99 1712]

@Luke would you please be kind enough to put the logo back where it was previously. Thanks.

[arrbee99 1712]

Another server update, no change.

[Guest]

Regardless of the size I didn't like this logo design in place of the text.
I live in Brazil and I always use the title of the film in the original language of the production, therefore, Italian, Spanish, French etc. and the logo is always in English, so I chose to keep it in text, which is even more stylish than the logo. , as we already have the logo in several other parts of the homepage and details screen. It's just a matter of personal taste.

[GrimReaper 4141]

2 minutes ago, CarlosLima said:

Regardless of the size I didn't like this logo design in place of the text.
I live in Brazil and I always use the title of the film in the original language of the production, therefore, Italian, Spanish, French etc. and the logo is always in English, so I chose to keep it in text, which is even more stylish than the logo. , as we already have the logo in several other parts of the homepage and details screen. It's just a matter of personal taste.

I have a feeling you've missed the point of this topic: it is not about Logo as title but logo placement itself, and NO, you don't have logo anywhere on the detail page any more save miniscule one in header bar. That is the issue. 

[Guest]

Oops, fact. One of the images confused me. Sorry for the out of context comment.

[Guest]

Coming back here to join the group that didn't approve this change in logo position and I'm rooting for the reversal. Thanks

[GrimReaper 4141]

On 6/12/2022 at 3:28 AM, GrimReaper said:

How can we get item logo back where it was before?

 

On 6/12/2022 at 3:43 AM, seanbuff said:

Yeah that's no good at all. With that location logos will always be restricted in size making some wide text almost unreadable. Can't understand the reason for that change either 

 

On 6/12/2022 at 11:22 AM, fillidill said:

Yes, please revert this! It's a horrible design decision to be frank. 

 

On 6/17/2022 at 11:46 PM, arrbee99 said:

@Luke would you please be kind enough to put the logo back where it was previously. Thanks.

 

8 hours ago, CarlosLima said:

Coming back here to join the group that didn't approve this change in logo position and I'm rooting for the reversal. Thanks

@Luke, some comment would be welcomed. Thank you. 

[Guest]

Due to the preference of some for the logo in the original position, maybe a CSS/HTML can solve the issue and thus serve everyone without changing what was defined by the development. I would like a code to restore the logo to the position and size it has always been used for.