bjjones 23 Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Did this get addressed/fixed in the 4.9.3.0 release? Like above I'm holding off moving from 4.8.11 - thanks
heffeque 92 Posted January 28 Posted January 28 Using stable version here. Maybe some brave knight will try it out to let us know!
sa2000 806 Posted January 31 Posted January 31 Emby Server Beta 4.10.0.2 is working for me with Hardware Acceleration and Tone Mapping on Synology with QuickSync GeminiLake UHD Graphics 600 GPU 1 1
heffeque 92 Posted January 31 Posted January 31 Awesome! Hopefully it comes to the stable branch soon! 1
NeverReadyEddie 2 Posted March 18 Posted March 18 Still waiting for 4.10.0.2 to his stable release. Any news on when that might be?
Luke 42828 Posted March 23 Posted March 23 On 3/18/2026 at 9:46 AM, NeverReadyEddie said: Still waiting for 4.10.0.2 to his stable release. Any news on when that might be? Hi, we are working on getting a new stable release together. Thanks.
Hot_Miguelus 0 Posted July 23 Posted July 23 Hi, I'm seeing exactly the same behaviour described in this thread on my Synology DS918+ (Intel J3455), but I spent some time trying to isolate the problem and I may have some additional information that could help. Environment Emby Server 4.9.5.0 Synology DS918+ Intel J3455 (Apollo Lake) DSM 7.2.x Hardware acceleration enabled (Quick Sync + VAAPI) Tested with: Emby Web (Chrome on Windows) Emby Windows app The problem Whenever an HDR video is transcoded using hardware acceleration, the image becomes washed out, as if HDR is being displayed as SDR without proper tone mapping. If I disable hardware acceleration and let FFmpeg perform software transcoding, the colours are correct. Tests performed I tried several different files and configurations to narrow it down. HDR10 4K Hardware transcoding → washed out colours. Software transcoding → colours are correct. Dolby Vision Profile 8.1 (HDR10 compatible) Hardware transcoding → washed out colours. Software transcoding → colours are correct. HDR10 1080p Hardware transcoding → washed out colours. I also tested: Quick Sync only (VAAPI disabled) Quick Sync + VAAPI Different remote streaming bitrates Different transcoding resolutions Emby Web and Emby Windows The behaviour is always the same. What I found in the logs The interesting part is that Emby reports: Tone Mapping would be desired, but hardware tone mapping is disabled but immediately afterwards the processing plan says: ToneMapping (when possible) CanDoInHW = True WillDoInHW = True When I inspect the generated FFmpeg command, I only see: HEVC_QSV → vpp_qsv (resize) → vpp_qsv (P010 → NV12) → H264_QSV I cannot find any actual tone mapping filter being inserted (tonemap, tonemap_opencl, zscale, or any explicit BT.2020 → BT.709 colour conversion). So it looks as if the processing plan expects hardware tone mapping to happen, but the generated FFmpeg command never actually performs it. Question Is this expected behaviour on Apollo Lake hardware, or could this be a bug or regression in the current hardware transcoding pipeline? I've attached three different ffmpeg-transcode logs showing the same behaviour: HDR10 4K HDR10 1080p Dolby Vision Profile 8.1 (I also attach a software transconding log for this one) If needed, I can also provide the corresponding embyserver logs. Thanks! 4KHDR-ffmpeg-transcode-ce9e3357-e5fe-4e89-8083-135e1897db1b_1.txt 1080pHDR-ffmpeg-transcode-265e6ece-46b8-4317-bfd4-953bd2d6a758_1.txt 4KDV-Software_deco-ffmpeg-transcode-c8af9373-a1a5-40c3-a4ee-3037e5dd825d_1.txt 4KDV-Hardware_deco-ffmpeg-transcode-d506bd22-4ef2-4fc2-b0d1-0fc352bc8d04_1.txt
heffeque 92 Posted July 23 Posted July 23 Let's see if 4.10 solves it soon. 4.10.0.20-beta came out recently. Release notes don't mention changes on transcoding, but 99% of times the release notes don't contain all changes, so who knows (shrug)
Luke 42828 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Hi, there will be a new ffmpeg build on the server beta channel soon, so stay tuned for that. Thanks.
softworkz 5331 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago On 7/23/2026 at 1:56 PM, Hot_Miguelus said: I cannot find any actual tone mapping filter being inserted (tonemap, tonemap_opencl, zscale, or any explicit BT.2020 → BT.709 colour conversion). So it looks as if the processing plan expects hardware tone mapping to happen, but the generated FFmpeg command never actually performs it. Question Is this expected behaviour on Apollo Lake hardware, or could this be a bug or regression in the current hardware transcoding pipeline? I've attached three different ffmpeg-transcode logs showing the same behaviour: Well, did you enable tone mapping actually?
sa2000 806 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago The Emby Server Synology issues with hardware transcoding and tone mapping being enabled should be resolved in 4.10.x.x which is currently available as beta. The 4.9.5 release does not have the fix
tlkounev 14 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago But we are waiting for a solution for qnap nas. @Luke wrote that maybe someone is solving it but we doubt it. Can someone from the devs confirm that anyone knows about it at all? Communication from the emby team is zero on this.
sa2000 806 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, tlkounev said: But we are waiting for a solution for qnap I know my reply was specifically addressing the new synology related post
sa2000 806 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 50 minutes ago, tlkounev said: ut we are waiting for a solution for qnap nas. @Luke wrote that maybe someone is solving it but we doubt it. Can someone from the devs confirm that anyone knows about it at all? Communication from the emby team is zero on this. An observation - this topic was for synology and is in the synology forum category. We have fixed it for synology. The QNAP issue should have been raised as a separate topic in the QNAP forum category. I will go through the posts in this topic and try to identify the QNAP related ones and move them to a new topic Edited 1 hour ago by sa2000
sa2000 806 Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago 1 hour ago, tlkounev said: But we are waiting for a solution for qnap nas. @Luke wrote that maybe someone is solving it but we doubt it. Can someone from the devs confirm that anyone knows about it at all? Communication from the emby team is zero on this. This post is the only QNAP related post in this synology topic. I am going to leave it here - since you have already posted in the QNAP related topic https://emby.media/community/topic/141387-tone-mapping-defaulting-to-software/page/5/#findComment-1505074 - you can add posts to that topic as the synology issue should already be fixed in the 4.10.x.x beta which will soon be released generally
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now