Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/25/25 in Posts

  1. It bears repeating that one of the critical requirements is an HTTPS connection, otherwise other auth improvements are just "security theater." As Let's Encrypt is supposed to be releasing IP-based certs by EOY 2025 (its available in their staging environment), this seems like a good foundation to build on for this and other auth improvements. There are quite a few low-restrictions OSS .NET implementations of the ACME v2 protocol clients that could be integrated into Emby server that would improve security and anonymity should the devs consider it.
    2 points
  2. Twelve days of Christmas and Emby gave to me: One home page spotlight Two smart lists playing Three collections nesting Four libraries expanding Five golden apps Six custom menus Seven search improvements Eight major updates Nine watches together Ten times the joy Eleven reasons not to use Plex Twelve months of entertainment Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to all!
    2 points
  3. I want to thank the entire community for coming up with a solution to my "Big Recent Problem". I saw input from a lot of different people, and together you came up with a solution. I don't know what happened, or what changed but the problem is solved THANK YOU ONE AND ALL AND HAPPY HOLIDAYS
    1 point
  4. I can Check that probably, I am not sure.
    1 point
  5. Hi, we are still looking at it. Thanks.
    1 point
  6. Did you manually set a Ip address on your server? 192.136 -> 192.168 seams like a type-o.
    1 point
  7. Please solve this problem, thank you.
    1 point
  8. "Ignorance is Bliss" until Emby doesn't automatically work the way you want it to.
    1 point
  9. Maybe a bad idea to show that here as it works as an advertisement for their URL.
    1 point
  10. I saw this post, but it was from 2022. Now it’s almost 2026, so I thought that maybe things have changed over the years. I hope this feature will be added in the future, because there are TV series with over a minute of “previously on” recaps. OK, thanks for all the answers.
    1 point
  11. Yeah, we should probably be more specific in the docs as to why one might want to do this and also point out that structure will only be visible with folder view. As written, I can see how the user thought this is what we recommended. In reality, the only reason one would want to do that with Emby would be the fact that some file systems may bog down after a very large number of items in a single directory (but this is like 35k I think). @sa2000
    1 point
  12. Hi @LukeI am facing the same issue here in Germany. I reat all threads here but didn't get if it is currently possible or not to get Emby running on that new OS. Merry Christmas Sascha
    1 point
  13. The feature is being described as bringing back the old legacy view for Folder View. It clearly does not do that. It is a bug. This is not "it doesn't work as I want it to"; It is that it does not do what it is described to do, iow duplicate the way it has worked for years. The feature does not work as the 4.8 and earlier Folder View did. Period. It is close, but is not recreating the legacy behavior as advertised. This is a beta feature and bug reports against it allow them to get it right. Please stop being an apologist for the facts that the devs did not consider some scenarios. The purpose of reporting issues is so they can present as polished a product as possible. Again, the code to do this is in the app already otherwise my old folders, which were created 4.8 or earlier, would not be working, but they are. All we are asking for is to just have the option for it to continue to work as it always has. I do not understand why you think that continuing to use the existing code to pick an image from the sub folders is somehow complex and performance hinfdering since it has done this for years and years without being either. iow the exact same code being used to pick an image from the sub folders can be used for picking an image from the images associated with the sub folders for a given N folder structure and associating that image with the parent folder is so complex or performance-hending. This is a freshman-level assignment to walk a direcotry tree. It is neither complex nor time-consuming. It is well within the capabilities of the developers to do (again, there is already code in the server doing this). Unless they know that there are scenarios they did not consider or test, how can they fix the product to the best it can be?
    1 point
  14. TVDB's "Book" order for Monogatari would be perfect (IMHO), but Emby doesn't yet support any orders beyond Broadcast, DVD and Absolute - it's a pain (for that and a few other series). Paul
    1 point
  15. With the first code above. Replace .backgroundContainer with .backgroundContainer:not(.backgroundContainer-transparent) in both spots @import url("https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Merienda+One"); .backgroundContainer:not(.backgroundContainer-transparent) { &:before, &:after { content: ""; position: fixed; top: -3000%; bottom: 0; right: 0; left: 0; background-color: rgba(black, 0.01); background-image: url(http://www.freepngimg.com/download/winter_snow/4-2-white-snow-png.png); background-size: 30%; -webkit-animation-name: MOVE-BG; -webkit-animation-duration: 500s; -webkit-animation-timing-function: linear; -webkit-animation-iteration-count: infinite; } } .backgroundContainer:not(.backgroundContainer-transparent) { &:before { filter: blur(4px); opacity: 0.8; top: -2500%; background-size: 60%; animation-duration: 400s; } &:after { filter: blur(2px); opacity: 0.8; top: -2000%; background-image: url(https://laviwebfiles.com/stage/codepen/4-2-white-snow-png.png); background-size: 70%; animation-duration: 300s; } } @-webkit-keyframes MOVE-BG { from { transform: translateY(0); } to { transform: translateY(70%); } }
    1 point
  16. I am just about finished flipping from Plex to Emby and 2FA is really the only big hole in the product. I know you are not going to force it but I would love to see a server side setting that we control individually that had the following 2FA: Optional, Required for Admins, Required for all users
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...