All Activity
- Past hour
-
Morpel joined the community
-
Evaa__]} joined the community
-
Panadolextra joined the community
-
you were right. i had to turn off IE Enhanced Security Configuration on the server. not sure what has changed since i have been running this server for many years and never encountered this before, but once i turned off IE ESC, file downloaded and updated no issues. guess that will have to be a part of my update process moving forward. thanks guys.
-
Subhojit ghosh joined the community
-
nilsonacosta joined the community
-
The ones that you configure in the UI when you setup the external player.
-
plus1234 joined the community
-
cm y joined the community
-
dtoledo joined the community
-
Hi, what makes you think it only recognizes the one from 1994?
-
carlos78 joined the community
-
LiorMaron joined the community
-
GrimReaper started following Same movie, different year release
-
Same movie, different year release
GrimReaper replied to Energon_Universe's topic in General/Windows
Add provider ID tags to folder names, i.e. The Lion King (1994) [tmdbid=8587] The Lion King (2019) [tmdbid=420818] https://emby.media/support/articles/Movie-Naming.html#id-tags-in-folder--file-names -
K1ng_Lear started following Subtitle select
-
This sounds similar to my issue which I started in the originally right over here: https://emby.media/community/topic/145895-pre-selected-subtitles-are-not-respected/
-
Energon_Universe started following Same movie, different year release
-
Hello again, I have an issue when there are movies with the same title but different release years. When they are named as shown in the screenshot, the server only recognizes the older one from 1994. As a workaround, if I rename the folder (not the file) to something like "Lion King New", the server recognizes it, but it can no longer automatically download the correct artwork/poster.
-
Based on your log file can you try downloading the file manually. Just paste the link into a web browser and see if it downloads successfully. If not than you have some local policy/rule blocking this website. https://embydata.com/downloads/server/release14/MediaBrowser.Server.Installer.application
- Today
-
Force Identification with Singular Source
tedfroop21 replied to DatBoiSus's topic in General/Windows
Alternately, you can join TVDB or themoviedb and help edit the series to get the data correct. It's not hard and they will likely appreciate it. Some of the problem with them is they are open and people make the data match what they have rather than make it correct. I just fixed a 168 episode series on TVDB that someone had reduced to 20 episodes to match their "best of" DVD or something rather than adding a best of DVD. It's an issue everywhere but the administrators are good about locking data - at least at TVDB once someone spends time to correct it. -
MediaSync - Automated -arr/Emby sync tool, media pipeline dashboard (coming soon)
Eigeplackter replied to gbarone123's topic in Third Party Apps
FYI: App still needs a retesting of the connection and refresh of librariers, to receive the actual software version of the arr apps or it irritates with "Upadate available" in the dashboard. -
GrimReaper started following Subtitle select
-
I would assume that that Brazil subtitle has no proper language code, just track Title set as Brazilian. What does Media Info section show for that sub?
-
@ebr? It is confusing having to analyze the top and bottom text each song to see what each string represents.
-
I have set to default português Brazilian. But when it have subrip, the system every time select just Portuguese I'm running android version in MI box 3.5.36
-
Try going to TVDB and simply looking up "Danganronpa" (without the 3), and you will see all the various series for the whole franchise. Yes, it's a mess (and looking at the details in the Wikipedia article about it confirms this), but at least you can then decide which versions of what they offer you want to go with, and then name your files appropriately so they get recognised (appropriately, in this case, may mean including the TVDBid in the main folder name). Paul
-
Hi. No these things can not be customized at this time.
-
I agree! There is a conflation of Dolby and Broadcasters.
-
But that's not Dolby's fault. They are not "greedy" for running a business.
-
Hello. I know this thread has not been updated. I am curious if there are any updates to this option,;to physically move Cast & Crew underneath the, "More Like This" option.
-
Hi, Yes, there is a way - as per Emby instructions here: https://emby.media/support/articles/Music-Naming.html If you don't want to use "Various Artists" perhaps use "Soundtrack" or "Compilation" or any name you wish. You can also assign multiple Album Artist entities to an individual Album if you want to. Emby is very flexible in this regard. I have hundreds of Albums set up in Emby with many different combinations (e.g.) Album below is assigned as both a "Tom Petty (Tribute)" album and as a "Soundtrack" album, even though the individual songs are by "Various Artists". If you are not familar with Mp3tag, the OP screenshot may not necessarily be showing all tags assigned to a specific track. You need to "View>Extended Tags" to see them all. Sometimes there could be conflicts between (e.g.) "Album Artist" and "AlbumArtist" that might not be visible in the default LHS tag panel. Also, it's usually a good idea to update your embedded metadata with a tagging app and then import the changes into Emby. If you change the info within Emby only, then any library rescan is likely to revert to the embedded metadata. Perhaps try a few tagging options for yourself and see if you can set up something that suits your needs? Cheers!
-
Though I understand what you are saying, the reality is bit different. If you make a great product, you can charge whatever the market will bear. I'm all about that! Broadcasters are using PUBLIC airwaves, we the people grant them the licenses with the deal that they must broadcast OTA for free for those who can tune in. Locking up signaling behind a new encryption scheme (DRM) and new audio scrambling and requiring TV/Box/HDHomerun to license is anathema to bargain with the people. If they want to do that with 3rd party cable providers and/or satellite, fine, I'm ok with that, but not OTA. I encourage everyone to read Nicks thoughts on the matter. They are insightful and correct IMO. Here are some documents for you to consume. https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/105252378905750/1 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/105250617122080/1 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10605451007887/1 For those interested, can follow Nick's thoughts on: https://forum.silicondust.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=133 I wish there was more coalesced thread, but it's ok, I can follow along.
-
Hi. No worries. Just not a subject for this forum.
-
fair enough. i understand. i didn't ment to get anyone angry or something, honestly i thought where i can get info if not at the source. but please don't be offended. subject closed
-
Hi. If there is, this is not the place to discuss it. Thanks.
-
This is the first time I've seen the wording to be "Emby Home". When I use that, everything seems to work properly. Simple solution! Thanks for responding.
-
Pixelsmash Vulnerability in ffmpeg (CVE-2026-8461) - Is Emby vulnerable?
softworkz replied to CHBMB's topic in General/Windows
Granted - communication can be improved, but at that point there wasn't really more to say than "we're looking into it", because it required us to get several people together who are working on the build and release processes for the various platforms and all their expertise, views and concerns had to be heared and considered to get to a decision what we will do about it. Normally, we have two active build setups, one for beta and one for stable. For most platforms, FFmpeg is independent from the server build, but for most Linux based platforms it's not. Right now we're in a transition phase: The beta is about to become released as stable and we already have the other build path set up for the future 8.0-based ffmpeg. Trying to return to the old stable setup for producing a release with only the ffmpeg change could be risky and might cause regressions - but it's one option. The other option is to release the current beta as stable - as planned. This still takes a few more days to evaluate. So it's not that the beta gets the patch first because it has a higher priority. The highest priority is always the stable release as it affects a high multiple of users, and that means it requires more planning, consideration and testing than the beta and in turn may take longer to get a patch released. I can assure you that we are trying to get a new stable out as soon as possible - one or the other way. Thanks for your friendly criticism.
