Nelyga 1 Posted January 28, 2021 Author Share Posted January 28, 2021 Sorry, which? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37009 Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 This user here: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelyga 1 Posted January 28, 2021 Author Share Posted January 28, 2021 Yes, problems is similar. One difference - my NAS 431, other 431+. Need to try. Weekend is is a good time for this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pansen 0 Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 6:43 PM, Luke said: @Nelyga ? I have a QNAP TS 431XeU and the same issue since more than one year. Can't access via web interface (connection refused). I have entered the command posted by alucryd with the following result: /share/CACHEDEV1_DATA/.qpkg/EmbyServer/emby-server.sh: line 20: kill: (5422) - No such process Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37009 Posted March 25, 2021 Share Posted March 25, 2021 Hi, would you mind trying the 4.6 beta channel? We had another user with a different older QNAP that is now reporting success with that. Thanks ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucryd 214 Posted May 7, 2021 Share Posted May 7, 2021 Could you guys give the following packages a try? https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.43/emby-server-qnap_4.6.0.43_arm-x31.qpkg https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.43/emby-server-qnap-mono_4.6.0.43_arm-x31.qpkg The first one is the same as you've been trying until now, only newer. The second one is based on mono instead of dotnet core, and should definitely work if the first one fails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucryd 214 Posted May 8, 2021 Share Posted May 8, 2021 First link updated again, it has been successfully tested on a 231 device, hopefully it works on 431 as well. If it does, we won't need the mono package after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelyga 1 Posted May 9, 2021 Author Share Posted May 9, 2021 Confirmed. Version 4.6.0.43 beta work on Qnap TS-431 4.3.6.1663 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37009 Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 Thanks for the feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pansen 0 Posted May 12, 2021 Share Posted May 12, 2021 On 5/7/2021 at 6:21 PM, alucryd said: Could you guys give the following packages a try? https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.43/emby-server-qnap_4.6.0.43_arm-x31.qpkg https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.43/emby-server-qnap-mono_4.6.0.43_arm-x31.qpkg The first one is the same as you've been trying until now, only newer. The second one is based on mono instead of dotnet core, and should definitely work if the first one fails. Thanks for the update. I've tried to install both packages but get the error message: Fehler 2021-05-12 18:05:36 --- 127.0.0.1 --- --- [App Center] Failed to install Emby Server 4.6.0.43. Installation package is incompatible. Use the correct package. Device is a TS-431XeU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelyga 1 Posted May 12, 2021 Author Share Posted May 12, 2021 I delete old version in server, after install first link https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.43/emby-server-qnap_4.6.0.43_arm-x31.qpkg - for me work this way. and I dont't know all AbraCadabra - you have to ask Luke or alucryd. They are monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelyga 1 Posted May 12, 2021 Author Share Posted May 12, 2021 and my device is simple Device is a - only TS-431 - not TS-431XeU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucryd 214 Posted May 14, 2021 Share Posted May 14, 2021 (edited) @Pansen Were you able to install one of them at some point? I'll try to determine if there's some specific build instructions for the rack devices. Side note: in any case you'll probably need the mono package, Alpine CPUs have been known to fail with dotnet core on both Qnap and Synology devices. Edited May 14, 2021 by alucryd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucryd 214 Posted May 14, 2021 Share Posted May 14, 2021 (edited) @Pansen No specific instructions in the QDK, however you might want to give either x41 package a try, looks like Qnap couldn't be bothered to name this device correctly. https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.45/emby-server-qnap_4.6.0.45_arm-x41.qpkg https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.45/emby-server-qnap-mono_4.6.0.45_arm-x41.qpkg The first one will most likely fail because of the Alpine CPU, hopefully the second one works. Edited May 14, 2021 by alucryd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pansen 0 Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 On 5/14/2021 at 9:39 AM, alucryd said: @Pansen No specific instructions in the QDK, however you might want to give either x41 package a try, looks like Qnap couldn't be bothered to name this device correctly. https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.45/emby-server-qnap_4.6.0.45_arm-x41.qpkg https://github.com/MediaBrowser/Emby.Releases/releases/download/4.6.0.45/emby-server-qnap-mono_4.6.0.45_arm-x41.qpkg The first one will most likely fail because of the Alpine CPU, hopefully the second one works. @alucrydFirst of all I would like to say thanks for providing support. Much appreciated! I've installed the non-mono package with the expected result (install went fine but unable to connect via web interface - ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED) Uninstalled this version afterwards and gave the mono version a try and boom, works perfectly! I guess I need to bump up the memory a bit since it is stuttering a bit when I play UHD content with a huge file size. I currently have 2GB. Do you think 4GB will be sufficient? Again, thank you so much! It finally works again thanks to you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37009 Posted May 16, 2021 Share Posted May 16, 2021 Thanks for the feedback ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucryd 214 Posted May 20, 2021 Share Posted May 20, 2021 @Pansen It depends, you should probably check if your CPU is not the bottleneck first. If it's not and your memory is full, then yes, go for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now