denywinarto 5 Posted May 25, 2020 Share Posted May 25, 2020 (edited) Looks like i posted in wrong subforum, please delete the other one mod. I'm working on a new server build with Xeon E2278G + X11SCA-F, And i plan to use Server 2019 as the baremetal to host 3 hyper-v servers, with one of them being emby server 2019, the other one is diskless server and Mikrotik server. Now the thing is, emby server OS has to be Server 2019 cause i already wrote some apps to help me with movie updating. So what is the current status of intel CPU transcoding under hyper-v ? I read some threads saying it's not possible awhile ago. Was going to use GPU but i'm out of PCIE x16 slots on my board (One for dual 10G, the other one for LSI raid card), leaving x4 slots but i think it's shared with U2 drive, and i'm using U2 drive for diskless server. Edited May 25, 2020 by denywinarto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbjtech 4222 Posted May 25, 2020 Share Posted May 25, 2020 Intel CPU is fine on Hyper-V, I used that today, allocate as many CPU threads as you can. But GPU passthrough is tricky on Hyper-V as you are probably aware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denywinarto 5 Posted May 25, 2020 Author Share Posted May 25, 2020 So quicksync works without issue? Thank goodness then, i probably mistook the cpu with gpu acceleration from a thread here .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbjtech 4222 Posted May 25, 2020 Share Posted May 25, 2020 (edited) So quicksync works without issue? Thank goodness then, i probably mistook the cpu with gpu acceleration from a thread here .. Quicksync is GPU - and I don't think you can pass that through easily. It's 'possible' as you are running Server 2019 (it's definitely not possible on Windows 10 Hyper-V role) - I believe you need to dedicate the hardware to a VM, you cannot share it's capabilities. I looked into this a while back but was not using Server 2019, so I abandoned it as a lost cause. Google is your friend and it will explain what's involved for the Server option .. Edited May 25, 2020 by rbjtech Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denywinarto 5 Posted May 25, 2020 Author Share Posted May 25, 2020 (edited) https://hardforum.com/threads/intel-quick-sync-and-hyper-v.1912054/ https://emby.media/community/index.php?/topic/67542-36084-exception-on-codec-detection/&do=findComment&comment=673599 Quicksync is GPU - and I don't think you can pass that through easily. It's 'possible' as you are running Server 2019 (it's definitely not possible on Windows 10 Hyper-V role) - I believe you need to dedicate the hardware to a VM, you cannot share it's capabilities. I looked into this a while back but was not using Server 2019, so I abandoned it as a lost cause. Google is your friend and it will explain what's involved for the Server option .. That is the thread that i was referring to.. So it's not possible? FYI i'd rather not use GPU and rely on quickysync alone for Emby @@softworkz Hmm might have to use UNC path with emby then, since it wont work inside VM The host would then be the one doing quickysync, wonder how well would that work.. Either That or i have to use physical server again https://ipcamtalk.com/threads/blue-iris-in-vmware-esxi-6-7-with-passthrough-of-intel-integrated-graphics.37768/ Looks like someone managed to get it work under esxi, but since my environment is mostly windows i'd rather use hyper-v i'm not sure if it'll work with my hardware too, plus i dont think the free version is enough for my needs Edited May 26, 2020 by denywinarto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbjtech 4222 Posted May 26, 2020 Share Posted May 26, 2020 UNC is fine - it's no different to a NAS in that regard. Personally, I always use UNC over drive letters anyway (incl local) as it's so much more flexible as you can move things around and just re-create the same share name without having to re-scan your entire emby database. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denywinarto 5 Posted May 28, 2020 Author Share Posted May 28, 2020 UNC is fine - it's no different to a NAS in that regard. Personally, I always use UNC over drive letters anyway (incl local) as it's so much more flexible as you can move things around and just re-create the same share name without having to re-scan your entire emby database. Hmm its already discussed here https://emby.media/community/index.php?/topic/52001-add-media-directly-or-via-network-paths/ I don't think i want to add more stability issues, it's already stable on the same machine. any thoughts from others who have tried quicksync under hyper-v? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37008 Posted May 28, 2020 Share Posted May 28, 2020 @@softworkz may have some insight about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now