lejared 29 Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 The Issue The overall image quality in the Samsung TV app is very poor. This is because the TV App requests every image (thumbnails, backdrops, posters, actors, photos, ...) with too aggressive JPEG compression from the server. It always uses "quality=50" in every request for any image. Please see examples from the log below. The Web app does not suffer from this issue as it request every image with quality=90 instead, which is perfectly fine! Please, improve the image quality in the TV app by setting this parameter to 90, just like in the web app or let me choose in the settings. Examples Here are some examples of poster images directly requested from my emby server, the left one with the tizen app settings and the right one with the web app settings. See the massive artifacts in the background of the first example the heavy color bleeding around the title in the second example. Please, also keep in mind, that this compression artifacts are much more visible on a big, high contrast TV screen than on the average, standard contrast PC / smartphone / tablet screen you're probably reading this post on right now. Logs Request from Samsung TV App (watch the quality=50 parameter at the End): 2019-12-10 21:37:43.791 Info HttpServer: HTTP GET http://192.168.178.25:8096/emby/Items/9736/Images/Primary?maxWidth=246&tag=a9097cc955000de90f891474a0229aeb&quality=50. UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (SMART-TV; LINUX; Tizen 3.0) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 TV Safari/538.1 Request from the Web App (uses the quality=90 parameter): 2019-12-10 22:15:08.413 Info HttpServer: HTTP GET http://192.168.178.25:8096/emby/Items/22638/Images/Primary?maxHeight=225&maxWidth=150&tag=22205197bdfe43dcbfa634f0f2610ae4&quality=90. UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:71.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/71.0 embyserver.txt 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37060 Posted December 12, 2019 Share Posted December 12, 2019 Hi, yes we're looking into it. Thanks for the feedback. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke 37060 Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 This will be improved in the next update to the app. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now