shorty1483 450 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 vs Referring to this http://emby.media/community/index.php?/topic/30373-dev-server-30586539062-changed-cover-aspect-ratio/page-2 , I know from last time you guys came to the right conclusion for presenting covers. But the Collcection Covers seems more correct to me. Why not presenting the single movie covers exactly like the collection ones when using Coverart. @@ebr @@Luke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebr 14902 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 It has to do with the exact shape of the cover. The web client makes a decision whether or not to stretch the image based on how close to its expected aspect ratio the source is. The one on the left is far enough off that it decides to preserve it. The one on the right isn't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shorty1483 450 Posted February 14, 2016 Author Share Posted February 14, 2016 (edited) It has to do with the exact shape of the cover. The web client makes a decision whether or not to stretch the image based on how close to its expected aspect ratio the source is. The one on the left is far enough off that it decides to preserve it. The one on the right isn't.Then you should think about implementing CDArt for single movie covers. This would also eliminate the stretched covers Edit: meh, just realized I asked this already[emoji14] Gesendet von meinem HTC One M8 mit Tapatalk Edited February 14, 2016 by elysium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebr 14902 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Yes, we discussed that previously and its not a bad idea. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now